Biodiversity Conservation in Agricultural Landscapes: Challenges and Opportunities of Coffee Agroforests in the Western Ghats, India

被引:89
作者
Garcia, Claude A. [1 ,2 ]
Bhagwat, Shonil A. [3 ]
Ghazoul, Jaboury [4 ]
Nath, Cheryl D. [2 ]
Nanaya, Konerira M. [2 ]
Kushalappa, Chepudira G. [5 ]
Raghuramulu, Yenugula [6 ]
Nasi, Robert [7 ]
Vaast, Philippe [8 ]
机构
[1] CIRAD, UPR 36, TA 10 D, F-34398 Montpellier 5, France
[2] French Inst Pondicherry, Pondicherry 605001, India
[3] Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
[4] ETH, Dept Environm Sci, Inst Terr Ecosyst, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Univ Agr Sci Bangalore, Coll Forestry, Ponnampet 571216, Karnataka, India
[6] Coffee Board, Cent Coffee Res Inst, Coffee Res Stn Post 577177, Karnataka, India
[7] CIFOR, Environm Serv & Sustainable Use Forests Programme, Bogor 16000, Indonesia
[8] CIRAD, UPR ETP 80, TA 10 D, F-34398 Montpellier 5, France
关键词
integrated conservation and development projects; livelihoods; landscape mosaics; coffee agroforestry; Western Ghats; FOREST; MANAGEMENT; REFUGE; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01386.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The new approaches advocated by the conservation community to integrate conservation and livelihood development now explicitly address landscape mosaics composed of agricultural and forested land rather than only protected areas and largely intact forests. We refer specifically to a call by Harvey et al. (2008) to develop a new approach based on six strategies to integrate biodiversity conservation with sustainable livelihoods in Mesoamerican landscape mosaics. We examined the applicability of this proposal to the coffee agroforests of the Western Ghats, India. Of the six strategies, only one directly addresses livelihood conditions. Their approach has a clear emphasis on conservation and, as currently formulated risks repeating the failures of past integrated conservation and development projects. It fails to place the aspirations of farmers at the core of the agenda. Thus, although we acknowledge and share the broad vision and many of the ideas proposed by this approach, we urge more balanced priority setting by emphasizing people as much as biodiversity through a careful consideration of local livelihood needs and aspirations.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 488
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
ALLEN GM, 1986, J FOREST, V84, P20
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Elephant-human conflict in Kodagu, southern India: Distribution patterns, people's perceptions and mitigation methods
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, MAKING PARKS WORK ST
[5]  
BAL P, 2008, THESIS FRENCH I POND
[6]   Shade management in coffee and cacao plantations [J].
Beer, J ;
Muschler, R ;
Kass, D ;
Somarriba, E .
AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 1997, 38 (1-3) :139-164
[7]  
Bhagwat SA, 2005, ECOL SOC, V10
[8]   Landscape approach to biodiversity conservation of sacred groves in the Western Ghats of India [J].
Bhagwat, SA ;
Kushalappa, CG ;
Williams, PH ;
Brown, ND .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (06) :1853-1862
[9]   Agroforestry: a refuge for tropical biodiversity? [J].
Bhagwat, Shonil A. ;
Willis, Katherine J. ;
Birks, H. John B. ;
Whittaker, Robert J. .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2008, 23 (05) :261-267
[10]  
BLANCHE R, 2002, SERVICES DISSERVICES