Effects of landscape characteristics on land-cover class accuracy

被引:159
作者
Smith, JH [1 ]
Stehman, SV
Wickham, JD
Yang, LM
机构
[1] US EPA, Landscape Characterizat Branch E243 05, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[2] SUNY Coll Environm Sci & Forestry, Dept Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[3] Raytheon Co, ITSS, Eros Data Ctr, Sioux Falls, SD 57198 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00126-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The effects of patch size and land-cover heterogeneity on classification accuracy were evaluated using reference data collected for the National Land-Cover Data (NLCD) set accuracy assessment. Logistic regression models quantified the relationship between classification accuracy and these landscape variables for each land-cover class at both the Anderson Levels I and II classification schemes employed in the NLCD. The general relationships were consistent, with the odds of correctly classifying a pixel increasing as patch size increased and decreasing as heterogeneity increased. Specific characteristics of these relationships, however, showed considerable diversity among the various classes. Odds ratios are reported to document these relationships. Interaction between the two landscape variables was not a significant influence on classification accuracy, indicating that the effect of heterogeneity was not impacted by the sample being in a small or large patch. Landscape variables remained significant predictors of class-specific accuracy even when adjusted for regional differences in the mapping and assessment processes or landscape characteristics. The land-cover class-specific analyses provide insight into sources of classification error and a capacity for predicting error based on a pixel's mapped land-cover class, patch size and surrounding land-cover heterogeneity. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 349
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Agresti A., 1996, INTRO CATEGORICAL DA
[2]  
Anderson J. F., 1976, 964 US GEOL SURV, DOI DOI 10.3133/PP964
[3]  
CAMPBELL JB, 1966, INTRO REMOTE SENSING
[4]  
Congalton R.G., 2019, Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed data: Principles and Practices
[5]  
CONGALTON RG, 1993, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V59, P641
[6]  
CONGALTON RG, 1983, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V49, P1671
[7]   Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment [J].
Foody, GM .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 80 (01) :185-201
[8]  
Hosmer D. W., 1989, APPL LOGISTIC REGRES, DOI DOI 10.1097/00019514-200604000-00003
[9]   A comparison of parametric classification procedures of remotely sensed data applied on different landscape units [J].
Hubert-Moy, L ;
Cotannec, A ;
Le Du, L ;
Chardin, A ;
Perez, P .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 75 (02) :174-187
[10]  
Jensen J. R., 1996, Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective.