Comparison of anthropometry to DXA: a new prediction equation for men

被引:120
作者
Ball, SD
Altena, TS
Swan, PD
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Nutr Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] SW Missouri State Univ, Dept Hlth Phys Educ & Recreat, Springfield, MO USA
[3] Arizona State Univ E, Dept Exercise & Wellness, Mesa, AZ USA
关键词
body composition; dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; body fat;
D O I
10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602003
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Objective: This study compared three professionally recommended anthropometric body composition prediction equations for men to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and then developed an updated equation, DXA Criterion ( DC) from DXA. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Exercise Physiology Lab. University of Missouri-Columbia, USA. Subjects: A total of 160 men aged 18-62 y old. Interventions: Percent body fat (%BF) by anthropometry was compared to DXA on the same day. Results: Although %BF was significantly correlated (r=0.923-0.942) (P<0.01) with DXA for all three equations, each equation underestimated %BF (range 3.1-3.3%) (P<0.01) compared to DXA. The following DC equation for men was created: %BF=0.465+0.180(Sigma7SF)-0.0002406(Sigma7SF)(2)+0.06619(age); (Sigma7SF=sum of chest, midaxillary, triceps, subscapular, abdomen, suprailiac, thigh; age years). The predicted residual sum of squares (PRESS)R-2 was high (0.90) and the PRESS standard error of estimates was excellent (2.2% at the mean) for the DC equation when applied to our sample of 160 men. Conclusions: The currently recommended anthropometric equations for men underestimate %BF compared to DXA. The DC equation yields a more accurate estimation of %BF in men aged 18-62 y old. The results from this study support the need for the current %BF standards and norms for men to be adjusted upward.
引用
收藏
页码:1525 / 1531
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2000, ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, V6th
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, J EXERC PHYSL ONLINE
  • [3] BAKKER HK, 1977, HUM BIOL, V49, P187
  • [4] BALL S, IN PRESS RES Q EXERC
  • [5] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [6] DENSITOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF BODY COMPOSITION REVISION OF SOME QUANTIATIVE ASSUMPTIONS
    BROZEK, J
    ANDERSON, JT
    KEYS, A
    GRANDE, F
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1963, 110 (01) : 113 - &
  • [7] Callaway CW, 1988, ANTHROPOMETRIC STAND, P39
  • [8] CLARK RR, 1993, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V25, P528
  • [9] Validity of methods of body composition assessment in young and older men and women
    Clasey, JL
    Kanaley, JA
    Wideman, L
    Heymsfield, SB
    Teates, CD
    Gutgesell, ME
    Thorner, MO
    Hartman, ML
    Weltman, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 86 (05) : 1728 - 1738
  • [10] BODY FAT ASSESSED FROM TOTAL-BODY DENSITY AND ITS ESTIMATION FROM SKINFOLD THICKNESS - MEASUREMENTS ON 481 MEN AND WOMEN AGED FROM 16 TO 72 YEARS
    DURNIN, JVGA
    WOMERSLEY, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1974, 32 (01) : 77 - 97