Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health,Social, and Behavioral Research:A Primer

被引:3113
作者
Boateng, Godfred O. [1 ]
Neilands, Torsten B. [2 ]
Frongillo, Edward A. [3 ]
Melgar-Quinonez, Hugo R. [4 ]
Young, Sera L. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Anthropol & Global Hlth, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Div Prevent Sci, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Univ South Carolina, Dept Hlth Promot Educ & Behav, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[4] McGill Univ, Sch Human Nutr, Inst Global Food Secur, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Northwestern Univ, Inst Policy Res, Evanston, IL USA
关键词
scale development; psychometric evaluation; content validity; item reduction; factor analysis; tests of dimensionality; tests of reliability; tests of validity; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; CLASSICAL TEST THEORY; INTRACLASS CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; SELF-EFFICACY SCALE; FOOD INSECURITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL-ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; INTERNAL STRUCTURE; FIT INDEXES;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
100235 [预防医学];
摘要
Scale development and validation are critical to much of the work in the health, social, and behavioral sciences. However, the constellation of techniques required for scale development and evaluation can be onerous, jargon-filled, unfamiliar, and resource-intensive. Further, it is often not a part of graduate training. Therefore, our goal was to concisely review the process of scale development in as straightforward a manner as possible, both to facilitate the development of new, valid, and reliable scales, and to help improve existing ones. To do this, we have created a primer for best practices for scale development in measuring complex phenomena. This is not a systematic review, but rather the amalgamation of technical literature and lessons learned from our experiences spent creating or adapting a number of scales over the past several decades. We identified three phases that span nine steps. In the first phase, items are generated and the validity of their content is assessed. In the second phase, the scale is constructed. Steps in scale construction include pre-testing the questions, administering the survey, reducing the number of items, and understanding how many factors the scale captures. In the third phase, scale evaluation, the number of dimensions is tested, reliability is tested, and validity is assessed. We have also added examples of best practices to each step. In sum, this primer will equip both scientists and practitioners to understand the ontology and methodology of scale development and validation, thereby facilitating the advancement of our understanding of a range of health, social, and behavioral outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 143 条
[1]
Ajzen I., 1985, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
[2]
Importance of cognitive testing for survey items: An example from food security questionnaires [J].
Alaimo, K ;
Olson, CM ;
Frongillo, EA .
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION, 1999, 31 (05) :269-275
[3]
[Anonymous], 1978, PYSCHOMETRIC THEORY
[4]
[Anonymous], 1993, Educational measurement: issues and practice
[5]
[Anonymous], 2004, TECHNICAL GUIDE DEV
[6]
[Anonymous], 2013, APPL RASCH MODEL FUN
[7]
[Anonymous], 1994, Pyschometric theory
[8]
[Anonymous], CONFIRMATORY FACTOR
[9]
[Anonymous], CONFIRMATORY FACTOR
[10]
[Anonymous], 1973, Structural Equation Models in the Social SicencesNew York, DOI 10.1002/j.2333-8504.1970.tb00783.x