Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular risk:: a cross-sectional analysis of a 20,000-patient database in Spain

被引:85
作者
Gorostidi, Manuel
Sobrino, Javier
Segura, Julian
Sierra, Cristina
de la Sierra, Alex
del Rey, Raquel Hernandez
Vinyoles, Ernest
Galceran, Josep M.
Lopez-Eady, Maria D.
Marin, Rafael
Banegas, Jose R.
Sarria, Antonio
Coca, Antonio
Ruilope, Luis M.
机构
[1] Hosp San Agustin, Secc Nefrol, Aviles 33400, Asturias, Spain
[2] Hosp Esperit Sant, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Hosp 12 Octubre, E-28041 Madrid, Spain
[4] Hosp Clin Barcelona, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain
[5] Hosp Gen Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
[6] CAP La Mina, St Andria Besos, Barcelona, Spain
[7] HOsp Manresa, Barcelona, Spain
[8] Univ Oviedo, Hosp Cent Asturias, E-33080 Oviedo, Spain
[9] Univ Autonoma Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
[10] Inst Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
关键词
ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; dipper; high; cardiovascular risk; hypertension; non-dipper;
D O I
10.1097/HJH.0b013e32809874a2
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) parameters in a broad sample of high-risk hypertensive patients. Methods The Spanish Society of Hypertension is developing a nationwide project in which more than 900 physicians send ABPM registries and corresponding clinical records to a central database via www.cardiorisc.com. Between June 2004 and July 2005 a 20 000-patient database was obtained; 17 219 were valid for analysis. Results We identified 6534 patients with high cardiovascular risk according to the 2003 European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology guidelines stratification score. Office blood pressure ( BP) was 158.8/89.9mmHg and 24-h BP was 135.8/77.0mmHg. Patients with grade 3 BP in the office showed ambulatory systolic BP values less than 160 mmHg in more than 80%. A non-dipping pattern was observed in 3836 cases (58.7%), whereas this abnormality was present in 47.9% of patients with low-to-moderate risk [odds ratio ( OR) 1.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45-1.64]. The prevalence of non-dippers was higher as ambulatory BP increased (approximate to 70% when 24-h systolic BP > 155 mmHg) and was similar in both groups. At the lowest levels of BP ( 24-h systolic BP < 135mmHg) a non-dipping pattern was more prevalent in high-risk cases (56.6 versus 45.7%; OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.40-1.64). Conclusion There was a remarkable discrepancy between office and ambulatory BP in high-risk hypertensive patients. The prevalence of a non-dipper BP pattern was almost 60%. In the lowest levels of ambulatory BP, high-risk patients showed a higher prevalence of non-dipping BP than lower-risk cases. These observations support the recommendation of a wider use of ABPM in high-risk hypertensive patients.
引用
收藏
页码:977 / 984
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Effectiveness of blood pressure control outside the medical setting
    Banegas, Jose R.
    Segura, Julian
    Sobrino, Javier
    Rodriguez-Artalejo, Fernando
    de la Sierra, Alejandro
    de la Cruz, Juan J.
    Gorostidi, Manuel
    Sarria, Antonio
    Ruilope, Luis M.
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2007, 49 (01) : 62 - 68
  • [2] Björklund K, 2004, J HYPERTENS, V22, P1691
  • [3] Prognostic value of ambulatory blood-pressure recordings in patients with treated hypertension
    Clement, DL
    De Buyzere, ML
    De Bacquer, DA
    de Leeuw, PW
    Duprez, DA
    Fagard, RH
    Gheeraert, PJ
    Missault, LH
    Braun, JJ
    Six, RO
    Van Der Niepen, P
    O'Brien, E
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (24) : 2407 - 2415
  • [4] Nocturnal non-dipping pattern in untreated hypertensives at different cardiovascular risk according to the 2003 ESH/ESC guidelines
    Cuspidi, C
    Meani, S
    Valerio, C
    Fusi, V
    Zanchetti, A
    [J]. BLOOD PRESSURE, 2006, 15 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [5] Superiority of ambulatory over clinic blood pressure measurement in predicting mortality - The Dublin Outcome Study
    Dolan, E
    Stanton, A
    Thijs, L
    Hinedi, K
    Atkins, N
    McClory, S
    Den Hond, E
    McCormack, P
    Staessen, JA
    O'Brien, E
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2005, 46 (01) : 156 - 161
  • [6] Prognostic significance of various characteristics of out-of-the-office blood pressure
    Fagard, RH
    Celis, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2004, 22 (09) : 1663 - 1666
  • [7] Ambulatory blood pressure and mortality - A population-based study
    Hansen, TW
    Jeppesen, J
    Rasmussen, S
    Ibsen, H
    Torp-Pedersen, C
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2005, 45 (04) : 499 - 504
  • [8] Prognostic significance of blood pressure and heart rate variabilities - The Ohasama study
    Kikuya, M
    Hozawa, A
    Ohokubo, T
    Tsuji, I
    Michimata, M
    Matsubara, M
    Ota, M
    Nagai, K
    Araki, T
    Satoh, H
    Ito, S
    Hisamichi, S
    Imai, Y
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2000, 36 (05) : 901 - 906
  • [9] Ambulatory blood pressure and 10-year risk of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality - The Ohasama Study
    Kikuya, M
    Ohkubo, T
    Asayama, K
    Metoki, H
    Obara, T
    Saito, S
    Hashimoto, J
    Totsune, K
    Hoshi, H
    Satoh, H
    Imai, Y
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2005, 45 (02) : 240 - 245
  • [10] 2003 European society of hypertension -: European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
    Mancia, G
    Rosei, EA
    Cifkova, R
    DeBacker, G
    Erdine, S
    Fagard, R
    Farsang, C
    Heagerty, AM
    Kawecka-Jaszcs, K
    Kiowski, W
    Kjeldsen, S
    Lüscher, T
    McInnes, G
    Mallion, JM
    Brien, EO
    Poulter, NR
    Priori, SG
    Rahn, KH
    Rodicio, JL
    Ruilope, LM
    Safar, M
    Staessen, JA
    van Zwieten, P
    Waeber, B
    Williams, B
    Zanchetti, A
    Zannad, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2003, 21 (06) : 1011 - 1053