Diffusion of low-carbon technologies and the feasibility of long-term climate targets

被引:111
作者
Iyer, Gokul [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hultman, Nathan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Eom, Jiyong [4 ]
McJeon, Haewon [2 ,3 ]
Patel, Pralit [2 ,3 ]
Clarke, Leon [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Publ Policy, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Pacific NW Natl Lab, Joint Global Change Res Inst, 5825 Univ Res Court,Suite 3500, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[4] Sogang Univ, Grad Sch Management Technol, Seoul 121742, South Korea
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Climate change; Technology diffusion; Carbon-free energy; ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; UNITED-KINGDOM; WIND ENERGY; STORAGE CCS; POLICY; CAPTURE; TRANSITION; DYNAMICS; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.025
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Stabilizing the global climate will require large-scale global deployment of low-carbon technologies. Even in the presence of aggressive climate policies, however, the diffusion of such technologies may be limited by several institutional, behavioral, and social factors. In this paper, we review the literature on the sources of such diffusion constraints, and explore the potential implications of such constraints based on the GCAM integrated assessment model. Our analysis highlights that factors that limit technology deployment may have sizeable impacts on the feasibility and mitigation costs of achieving stringent stabilization targets. And such impacts are greatly amplified with major delays in serious climate policies. The results generally indicate that constraints on the expansions of CCS and renewables are more costly than those on nuclear or bioenergy, and jointly constraining these technologies leaves some scenarios infeasible. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 118
页数:16
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, TECHN ROADM CARB CAP
[2]   COMPETING TECHNOLOGIES, INCREASING RETURNS, AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS [J].
ARTHUR, WB .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1989, 99 (394) :116-131
[3]   Impact of public policy uncertainty on renewable energy investment: Wind power and the production tax credit [J].
Barradale, Merrill Jones .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (12) :7698-7709
[4]   Inclusion of technology diffusion in energy-systems models: some gaps and needs [J].
Barreto, Leonardo ;
Kemp, Rene .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2008, 16 :S95-S101
[5]   Delayed action and uncertain stabilisation targets. How much will the delay cost? [J].
Bosetti, Valentina ;
Carraro, Carlo ;
Sgobbi, Alessandra ;
Tavoni, Massimo .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2009, 96 (03) :299-312
[6]  
Brown M.A., 2008, CARBON LOCK IN BARRI
[7]   Which renewable energy policy is a venture capitalist's best friend? Empirical evidence from a survey of international cleantech investors [J].
Buerer, Mary Jean ;
Wuestenhagen, Rolf .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (12) :4997-5006
[8]   The distribution and magnitude of emissions mitigation costs in climate stabilization under less than perfect international cooperation: SGM results [J].
Calvin, Katherine ;
Patel, Pralit ;
Fawcett, Allen ;
Clarke, Leon ;
Fisher-Vanden, Karen ;
Edmonds, Jae ;
Kim, Son H. ;
Sands, Ron ;
Wise, Marshall .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 :S187-S197
[9]  
Carlsson B., 1997, TECHNOLOGICAL SYSTEM, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-6133-0
[10]   MODELING ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES IN A COMPETITIVE MARKET [J].
CLARKE, JF ;
EDMONDS, JA .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1993, 15 (02) :123-129