Higher-level motor processes

被引:40
作者
Rumiati, Raffaella Ida [1 ,2 ]
Papeo, Liuba [1 ]
Corradi-Dell'Acqua, Corrado [1 ]
机构
[1] Scuola Int Super Studi Avanzati, Cognit Neurosci Sector, I-34014 Trieste, Italy
[2] Univ Trent, Ctr Mind Brain Sci CIMeC, I-38100 Trento, Italy
来源
YEAR IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE 2010 | 2010年 / 1191卷
关键词
apraxia; tool use; imitation; body representation; dual route; IDEATIONAL APRAXIA; SEMANTIC MEMORY; MIRROR NEURONS; NEURAL MECHANISMS; HUMAN-BODY; OBJECT USE; TOOL USE; PANTOMIME RECOGNITION; ACTION REPRESENTATION; CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05442.x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Traditionally the motor system was thought of as a movement output device that, after brain damage, can impede patients from correctly planning and executing an action. In the last 20 years neuropsychological observations have contributed to the development of a new view that attributes higher-level functions to this system. Rapidly, this area of investigation has grown very popular, with motor representations being considered critical for action and object recognition, imagery and even language understanding. At present, we can distinguish between embodied and disembodied theories. The former predominantly are built on associations of deficits in these abilities whereas the latter rely on dissociations between deficits. Neuroimaging research has also showed that different action-related functions activate either overlapping or discrete regions, thus sustaining either association-based or dissociation-based models. Although no convincing theory is, to date, available to explain both sets of observations, cognitive neuroscientists have begun to explore this intermediate hypothesis space. Here we suggest that concepts like strategy and simulation seem promising in explaining how the cognitive system alternates between action-related functions.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 241
页数:23
相关论文
共 162 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1980, METAPHORS WE LIVE BY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, NEUROPSYCHOLOGY MENT
[3]   Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems [J].
Barsalou, LW ;
Simmons, WK ;
Barbey, AK ;
Wilson, CD .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2003, 7 (02) :84-91
[4]   Double dissociation between meaningful and meaningless gesture reproduction in apraxia [J].
Bartolo, A ;
Cubelli, R ;
Della Sala, S ;
Drei, S ;
Marchetti, C .
CORTEX, 2001, 37 (05) :696-699
[5]   Goal-directed imitation in patients with ideomotor apraxia [J].
Bekkering, H ;
Brass, M ;
Woschina, S ;
Jacobs, AM .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 22 (3-4) :419-432
[6]   PANTOMIME RECOGNITION IMPAIRMENT IN APHASIA - AN ANALYSIS OF ERROR TYPES [J].
BELL, BD .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1994, 47 (02) :269-278
[7]   Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension [J].
Bergen, Benjamin K. ;
Lindsay, Shane ;
Matlock, Teenie ;
Narayanan, Srini .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2007, 31 (05) :733-764
[8]   A fronto-parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: evidence from an fMRI-study [J].
Binkofski, F ;
Buccino, G ;
Posse, S ;
Seitz, RJ ;
Rizzolatti, G ;
Freund, HJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 11 (09) :3276-3286
[9]   The influence of personal familiarity and context on object use in semantic dementia [J].
Bozeat, S ;
Ralph, MAL ;
Patterson, K ;
Hodges, JR .
NEUROCASE, 2002, 8 (1-2) :127-134
[10]   Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements:: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues [J].
Brass, M ;
Bekkering, H ;
Wohlschläger, A ;
Prinz, W .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2000, 44 (02) :124-143