Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to improve naming ability in post-stroke aphasia: A critical review

被引:24
作者
ALHarbi, Mohammed F. [1 ,4 ]
Armijo-Olivo, Susan [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Esther S. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Rehabil Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Rehabil Res Ctr, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] Taibah Univ, Dept Speech Language Pathol & Audiol, Coll Med Rehabil Sci, Madinah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; Post-stroke; Anomia; Naming ability; Aphasia; Language disorder; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; BROCAS AREA; RECOVERY; STROKE; SAFETY; REHABILITATION; FACILITATION; METAANALYSIS; PLASTICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bbr.2017.05.050
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
010107 [宗教学]; 030301 [社会学]; 070906 [古生物学及地层学(含古人类学)];
摘要
Purpose: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation tool that can be used to influence cortical brain activity to induce measurable behavioral changes. Although there is growing evidence that tDCS combined with behavioural language therapy could boost language recovery in patients with post stroke aphasia, there is great variability in patient characteristics, treatment protocols, and outcome measures in these studies that poses challenges for analyzing the evidence. The purpose of this study is to critically analyze the methodological rigor of the evidence regarding the use of tDCS for post-stroke anomia. Method This critical review was conducted by searching four databases (MEDLINE, EMBase, PsycINFO, and CLNAHL). Nineteen studies fully met the inclusion criteria. Three critical appraisal tools and Robey and Schultz's (1998) five-phase model for conducting clinical outcome research were adopted to evaluate and analyze the current level of evidence. Methodological issues of the studies were also identified. Results: The current level of evidence for using tDCS for anomia is at the pre-efficacy level with emerging evidence at the efficacy level. Lack of proper evaluation of carry-over effects in cross-over studies, lack of or unclear randomization, allocation concealment, and incomplete data handling were the main methodological issues that could threaten the validity of the tDCS for anomia studies. Conclusions: Several methodological issues have been identified in pre-efficacy studies that pose challenges in determining whether tDCS is a beneficial adjunct to behavioral aphasia therapy. Future studies need to improve the quality of the methods used to investigate the effect of tDCS for anomia.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 15
页数:9
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]
The complementary role of the cerebral hemispheres in recovery from aphasia after stroke: A critical review of literature [J].
Anglade, Carole ;
Thiel, Alexander ;
Ansaldo, Ana Ines .
BRAIN INJURY, 2014, 28 (02) :138-145
[2]
[Anonymous], ANOMIA THEORETICAL C
[3]
[Anonymous], NEURAL PLAS
[4]
[Anonymous], APHASIOL DISORD CLIN
[5]
[Anonymous], 2016, BRAIN
[6]
[Anonymous], FRONTIERS HUMAN NEUR
[7]
Intention to treat analysis, compliance, drop-outs and how to deal with missing data in clinical research: a review [J].
Armijo-Olivo, Susan ;
Warren, Sharon ;
Magee, David .
PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS, 2009, 14 (01) :36-49
[8]
Using Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation to Treat Stroke Patients With Aphasia [J].
Baker, Julie M. ;
Rorden, Chris ;
Fridriksson, Julius .
STROKE, 2010, 41 (06) :1229-1236
[9]
Cognitive neuropsychological rehabilitation: The emperor's new clothes? [J].
Basso, A ;
Marangolo, P .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2000, 10 (03) :219-229
[10]
Transcranial direct current stimulation to improve naming abilities of persons with chronic aphasia: A preliminary study using individualized based protocol [J].
Ben Basat, Adi Lifshitz ;
Gvion, Aviah ;
Vatine, Jean-Jacques ;
Mashal, Nira .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLINGUISTICS, 2016, 38 :1-13