Validation of Heine Gamma G7 (G5) and XXL-LF aneroid devices for blood pressure measurement

被引:11
作者
Dorigatti, Francesca [1 ]
Bonso, Elisa [1 ]
Zanier, Ada [1 ]
Palatini, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dipartimento Med Clin & Sperimentale, I-35128 Padua, Italy
关键词
aneroid; blood pressure; hypertension; sphygmomanometer; validation;
D O I
10.1097/01.mbp.0000217997.19839.39
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the accuracy of the Gamma G7 (and G5 model) and XXL-LF aneroid sphygmomanometers developed by the Heine Company. Design Device evaluations were performed using the new protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. Monitor performance was assessed in relation to participants' sex, age, arm circumference, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Methods The two sphygmomanometers were assessed in two different samples according to European Society of Hypertension requirements, which are based on four zones of accuracy differing from the mercury standard by 5, 10, 15 mmHg, or more. Results Both sphygmomanometers passed all three phases of the protocol for systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Mean blood pressure difference between Gamma G7 sphygmomanometer and observers was -0.4 +/- 3.3 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and - 0.5 +/- 2.6 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. Mean differences for the Gamma XXL-LF sphygmomanometer were - 0.3 +/- 3.7 and - 1.0 +/- 2.6 mmHg, respectively. In multivariable analyses, the SBP discrepancies between both aneroid sphygmomanometers and observers were unrelated to age, sex, arm circumference and systolic blood pressure. For diastolic blood pressure, a borderline relationship was found only for arm circumference (P=0.057) with the Gamma G7 device. Conclusions These data show that the Heine Gamma G7 and Gamma XXL-LF aneroid sphygmomanometers satisfy the new recommended ESH accuracy levels for both SBP and DBR Their performance is uniform across subgroups of participants with different clinical characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 33
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, AM NAT STAND EL AUT
[2]   ANEROID SPHYGMOMANOMETERS - AN ASSESSMENT OF ACCURACY AT A UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AND CLINICS [J].
BAILEY, RH ;
KNAUS, VL ;
BAUER, JH .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1991, 151 (07) :1409-1412
[3]  
BOWMAN CE, 1981, LANCET, V1, P1005
[4]   Are aneroid sphygmomanometers accurate in hospital and clinic settings? [J].
Canzanello, VJ ;
Jensen, PL ;
Schwartz, GL .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 161 (05) :729-731
[5]   The Accoson Greenlight 300™, the first non-automated mercury-free blood pressure measurement device to pass the International Protocol for blood pressure measuring devices in adults [J].
Graves, JW ;
Tibor, M ;
Murtagh, B ;
Klein, L ;
Sheps, SG .
BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2004, 9 (01) :13-17
[6]   How accurate are sphygmomanometers? [J].
Mion, D ;
Pierin, AMG .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 1998, 12 (04) :245-248
[7]   Consequences of banning mercury and the cuff controversy [J].
O'Brien, E .
BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2000, 5 (01) :33-34
[8]   Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults [J].
O'Brien, E ;
Pickering, T ;
Asmar, R ;
Myers, M ;
Parati, G ;
Staessen, J ;
Mengden, T ;
Imai, Y ;
Waeber, B ;
Palatini, P ;
Atkins, N ;
Gerin, W .
BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2002, 7 (01) :3-17
[9]   INACCURACY OF 7 POPULAR SPHYGMOMANOMETERS FOR HOME MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD-PRESSURE [J].
OBRIEN, E ;
MEE, F ;
ATKINS, N ;
OMALLEY, K .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1990, 8 (07) :621-634
[10]   The case for a hybrid sphygmomanometer [J].
Pickering, T .
BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2001, 6 (04) :177-179