The London Model: forecasting fog at 333 m resolution

被引:95
作者
Boutle, I. A. [1 ]
Finnenkoetter, A. [1 ]
Lock, A. P. [1 ]
Wells, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Met Off, FitzRoy Rd, Exeter EX1 3PB, Devon, England
关键词
fog; cloud; stable boundary layer; high resolution modelling; urban; STABLE BOUNDARY-LAYER; RADIATION FOG; PREDICTION; PARAMETERIZATION; STRATOCUMULUS; SIMULATIONS; VISIBILITY; ATMOSPHERE; SURFACE; SCHEME;
D O I
10.1002/qj.2656
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
A very high resolution numerical weather prediction model is nested inside the Met Office's main United Kingdom forecast model to investigate whether further enhancements to resolution provide any benefit for fog forecasting. The London Model shows similar performance to its lower resolution equivalent at short lead times, but improved performance at longer lead times and an improved frequency bias of forecast fog events. Differences in the model cloud parametrization are the key reason for the differing behaviour, leading to systematically less cloud, colder night time minimum temperatures and therefore more fog in the London Model. Benefit of the enhanced resolution is also found, via an improved representation of how orographic variability enhances turbulence in the stable boundary layer.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 371
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   An intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of the stable boundary layer [J].
Beare, RJ ;
MacVean, MK ;
Holtslag, AAM ;
Cuxart, J ;
Esau, I ;
Golaz, JC ;
Jimenez, MA ;
Khairoutdinov, M ;
Kosovic, B ;
Lewellen, D ;
Lund, TS ;
Lundquist, JK ;
McCabe, A ;
Moene, AF ;
Noh, Y ;
Raasch, S ;
Sullivan, P .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2006, 118 (02) :247-272
[2]   Quality assessment of the Cobel-Isba numerical forecast system of fog and low clouds [J].
Bergot, Thierry .
PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2007, 164 (6-7) :1265-1282
[3]   Seamless Stratocumulus Simulation across the Turbulent Gray Zone [J].
Boutle, I. A. ;
Eyre, J. E. J. ;
Lock, A. P. .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2014, 142 (04) :1655-1668
[4]   Prediction of visibility and aerosol within the operational Met Office Unified Model. I: Model formulation and variational assimilation [J].
Clark, P. A. ;
Harcourt, S. A. ;
Macpherson, B. ;
Mathison, C. T. ;
Cusack, S. ;
Naylor, M. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 134 (636) :1801-1816
[5]   Fog research:: A review of past achievements and future perspectives [J].
Gultepe, I. ;
Tardif, R. ;
Michaelides, S. C. ;
Cermak, J. ;
Bott, A. ;
Bendix, J. ;
Mueller, M. D. ;
Pagowski, M. ;
Hansen, B. ;
Ellrod, G. ;
Jacobs, W. ;
Toth, G. ;
Cober, S. G. .
PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2007, 164 (6-7) :1121-1159
[6]   A new visibility parameterization for warm-fog applications in numerical weather prediction models [J].
Gultepe, I. ;
Mueller, M. D. ;
Boybeyi, Z. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2006, 45 (11) :1469-1480
[7]  
Hughes JK., 2015, Geosci Model Dev Discuss, V8, P4453, DOI DOI 10.5194/GMDD-8-4453-2015
[8]  
King JC, 2001, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V127, P779, DOI 10.1002/qj.49712757304
[9]   Observations of the site dependency of the morning wind and the role of gravity waves in the transitions [J].
Lapworth, A. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 141 (686) :27-36
[10]  
Lock AP, 2000, MON WEATHER REV, V128, P3187, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<3187:ANBLMS>2.0.CO