Evaluating acids and chelating agents for removing heavy metals from contaminated soils

被引:86
作者
Neale, CN [1 ]
Bricka, RM
Chao, AC
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Houston, TX 77005 USA
[2] USA, Engineer Waterways Expt Stn, Vicksburg, MS 39180 USA
[3] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS | 1997年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1002/ep.3300160416
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
the prevalence of heavy metal soil contamination at Army facilities poses a serious threat to human health and the environment. To address this problem, the US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station in Vicksburg. MS is developing a mobile pilot-scale soil washing treatment facility that can be used to remove metals from the contaminated soils. To support this project, laboratory studies were conducted on both acids and chelating agents to evaluate their ability in extracting heavy metals from contaminated soils. Eight soils contaminated with lead, cadmium, and chromium were selected for use in this study. Contaminant concentrations in the various soils ranged from 4,000-30,000 mg/kg lead, 40-1,000 mg/kg cadmium, and 500-2,000 mg/kg chromium. The results indicated that, before a full-scale clean-up in initiated, a preliminary investigation is needed to determine principal contaminants of concern, their concentrations, and soil type followed by treatability studies to determine optimal reagent and concentrations of reagents for cleanup. Specific results from this study also indicated that Cd was the easiest metal to remove from soils followed by Pb and Cr. The results also suggested that the strong acids and chelating agents were both effective extracting agents, and the latter group of compounds may be more useful in soil washing because they are less harmful to the soil environment. Finally, higher initial concentrations of metal contaminants in the soil resulted in greater metal removal efficiencies using the reagents.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 280
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
ASSINK JW, 1985, TNO C CONT SOIL MART
[2]  
BRICKA R, 1994, IRRP941 US ARM ENG W
[3]  
BRICKA RM, 1993, IRRP931 US ARM ENG W
[4]  
*DOW CHEM CO, KEYS CHEL
[5]  
ELLIOTT HA, 1989, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V45, P361
[6]  
Manahan S. E., 1994, ENV CHEM
[7]  
MORTAZAVI S, 1992, ENV CANADA CHEM SPIL
[8]  
NEALE CN, 1995, THESIS N CAROLINA ST
[9]   EFFICIENCIES OF EXTRACTANTS USED IN ANALYSES OF HEAVY-METALS IN SLUDGES [J].
NEUHAUSER, EF ;
HARTENSTEIN, R .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1980, 9 (01) :21-22
[10]  
*OUT RES OY, 1994, HSC CHEM WIND