The article explores the evolution of competing views on state, administration arid governance in Germany from an historical perspective, with an emphasis on the last five decades. To Understand the governance discourse in Germany one has to start from different notions of the state. The first part therefore offers a brief, somewhat polemic, overview about different state traditions in Germany in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, The second part looks at how discourses about the proper role, the appropriate structures and processes of the public sector and its interactions with its environment have changed during the history of the Federal Republic. The analytic foci-is is on the different narratives about administrative policies, understood as the various scenarios, assumptions and arguments on which competing policy-suggestions for the public sector have been based. The article argues that it is not sufficient to interpret the tips and downs of different discourses and Leitbilder as more or less erratic, post-modern fashions and fads, Instead, the line Lip of the central catch-phrases, from democratic via active and lean to the activating state, reflect learning processes, driven above all by the political competition creating a continuous demand for 'better', more appropriate narratives to guide and explain current policies.
