Participatory Governance: Hope or Danger for Democracy? A Case Study of Local Agenda 21

被引:47
作者
Geissel, Brigitte [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Polit Wissensch, D-64283 Darmstadt, Germany
关键词
Governance; participation; civil society; consultative procedures;
D O I
10.1080/03003930902999522
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Participatory governance is a concept that is receiving increasing prominence. However, more empirical research is needed to clarify whether participatory governance is beneficial or detrimental to democracy. The local level is a dynamic field for participatory experiments and, therefore, particularly rewarding for researchers interested in scrutinizing the impacts of participatory governance empirically. In this article, Local Agenda 21 serves as an example to discuss both hypotheses. The study, conducted predominantly in Germany, shows that neither the supporters nor the sceptics of participatory governance are completely right. The findings about Local Agenda 21 demonstrate that this form of participatory governance can improve civic skills and social capital, but has little impact on input-legitimacy and is barely effective, i.e. reaches the goal of enforcing sustainable development only to a limited degree.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 414
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, KOOPERATIVE DEMOKRAT
[2]  
[Anonymous], NACHHALTIGKEITSINDIK
[3]  
BRAND KW, 2000, ZWISCHENBERICHT BEDI
[4]   Bringing local knowledge into environmental decision making - Improving urban planning for communities at risk [J].
Corburn, J .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2003, 22 (04) :420-433
[5]  
Cortner H. J., 1999, POLITICS ECOSYSTEM M, P91
[6]  
Diekmann A, 1998, Z SOZIOL, V27, P438
[7]  
DREWES S, 2003, ENQUETE KOMMISSION Z, P161
[8]  
ECKERBERG K, 1999, IMPLEMENTING LA21 EU, P241
[9]  
Feindt Peter H., 2001, REGIERUNG DURCH DISK
[10]  
FEINDT PH, 2000, LOKALE AGENDA 21 PRO, P217