Context dependence in the coevolution of plant and rhizobial mutualists

被引:190
作者
Heath, Katy D. [1 ]
Tiffin, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Biol Sci Ctr 250, Dept Plant Biol, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
genotype by environment; coevolution; cheating; symbiosis; cooperation; partner choice;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2007.0495
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Several mechanisms are expected to rapidly rid mutualisms of genetic variation in partner quality. Variation for mutualist quality, however, appears to be widespread. We used a model legume-rhizobium mutualism to test for evidence that context-dependent selection may maintain variation in partner quality. In a greenhouse experiment using 10 natural populations of Medicago truncatula and two strains of Sinorhizobium medicae, we detected significant genotype x genotype (GxG) interactions for plant fitness, indicating that the most beneficial rhizobium strain depends on the host genotype. In a second experiment using a subset of the plant populations used in the first experiment, we detected significant GxG interactions for both plant and rhizobium fitness. Moreover, the plant population with which rhizobium strains gained the greatest benefit depended on the nitrogen environment. Finally, we found that in a high nitrogen environment, all plant populations had lower fitness when inoculated with a 1 : 1 mixture of strains than with the worse single strain alone, suggesting that nitrogen shifts the exchange of benefits in favour of rhizobia. Our data suggest that genotype, nitrogen and biotic dependency might contribute to the maintenance of genetic variation in mutualist quality when coupled with spatial or temporal heterogeneity in the environment.
引用
收藏
页码:1905 / 1912
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1971, Theoretical aspects of population genetics
[2]   Recombination and selection shape the molecular diversity pattern of nitrogen-fixing Sinorhizobium sp associated to Medicago [J].
Bailly, Xavier ;
Olivieri, Isabelle ;
De Mita, Stephane ;
Cleyet-Marel, Jean-Claude ;
Bena, Gilles .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2006, 15 (10) :2719-2734
[3]   Dynamics within mutualism and the maintenance of diversity: inference from a model of interguild frequency dependence [J].
Bever, JD .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 1999, 2 (01) :52-62
[4]   Spatial patterns of inorganic N, P availability, and organic C in relation to soil disturbance: a chronosequence analysis [J].
Boerner, REJ ;
Scherzer, AJ ;
Brinkman, JA .
APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 1998, 7 (02) :159-177
[5]   OUR CURRENT UNDERSTANDING OF MUTUALISM [J].
BRONSTEIN, JL .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 1994, 69 (01) :31-51
[6]   CONDITIONAL OUTCOMES IN MUTUALISTIC INTERACTIONS [J].
BRONSTEIN, JL .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1994, 9 (06) :214-217
[7]   DISTINGUISHING MECHANISMS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION [J].
BULL, JJ ;
RICE, WR .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1991, 149 (01) :63-74
[8]   Variation in the effectiveness of symbiotic associations between native rhizobia and temperate Australian Acacia:: within-species interactions [J].
Burdon, JJ ;
Gibson, AH ;
Searle, SD ;
Woods, MJ ;
Brockwell, J .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1999, 36 (03) :398-408
[9]   Model legumes get the nod [J].
Cook, DR ;
VandenBosch, K ;
deBruijn, FJ ;
Huguet, T .
PLANT CELL, 1997, 9 (03) :275-281
[10]   Legume sanctions and the evolution of symbiotic cooperation by rhizobia [J].
Denison, RF .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2000, 156 (06) :567-576