Environmental contaminants in the botanical dietary supplement Ginseng and potential human risk

被引:19
作者
Huggett, DB [1 ]
Block, DS
Khan, IA
Allgood, JC
Benson, WH
机构
[1] Univ Mississippi, Dept Pharmacol, Sch Pharm, University, MS 38677 USA
[2] Univ Mississippi, Natl Ctr Nat Prod Res, University, MS 38677 USA
[3] Univ Mississippi, Dept Environm & Community Hlth Res, University, MS 38677 USA
来源
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT | 2000年 / 6卷 / 05期
关键词
botanicals; human health; risk assessment; pesticides; metals; Ginseng;
D O I
10.1080/10807030091124185
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Botanical dietary supplements have a long history of use in Europe and Asia, but the use of these products is becoming increasing popular in the United States. Because these products are classified as dietary supplements, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration does not routinely monitor them for environmental contaminants. Ginseng served as a model botanical dietary supplement and was purchased from suppliers in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Samples were analyzed for metals (e.g., cadmium, nickel) and chlorinated pesticides (e.g., PCNB, DDT, and metabolites). Flame and furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry were utilized for analysis of metals, while gas chromatography (GC) and CC-mass spectrophotometry were utilized for analysis of chlorinated pesticides. Because no formalized guidelines exist to determine risk of botanical dietary supplements, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency guidelines for protection of human health were used. Metals and chlorinated organics were found in Ginseng samples, but the concentrations posed no noncarcinogenic hazard; however, a 1000 mg/d dose for 350 d/yr resulted in 1 x 10(-6) carcinogenic risk in 19% of the Ginseng samples analyzed. At a lower usage rate (42 d/yr), no samples exceeded 1 x 10(-6) risk. Chlorinated organics, such as aldrin and heptachlor epoxide, accounted for the carcinogenic risk (1 x 10(-6)) in the Ginseng samples.
引用
收藏
页码:767 / 776
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Albering HJ, 1999, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V107, P37, DOI [10.2307/3434287, 10.1289/ehp.9910737]
  • [2] *ATSDR, 1996, TOX PROF CDROM
  • [3] Brevoort P., 1998, HerbalGram, P33
  • [4] CHINESE HERBAL MEDICINES REVISITED - A HONG-KONG PERSPECTIVE
    CHAN, TYK
    CHAN, JCN
    TOMLINSON, B
    CRITCHLEY, JAJH
    [J]. LANCET, 1993, 342 (8886-7) : 1532 - 1534
  • [5] DUNBABIN DW, 1992, MED J AUSTRALIA, V157, P835
  • [6] FARLEY D, 1994, CONSUMERS RES, V77, P15
  • [7] Kabelitz L., 1998, EUR J HERB MED, V4, P25
  • [8] LESSON OF THE WEEK - ARSENIC AND MERCURY INTOXICATION DUE TO INDIAN ETHNIC REMEDIES
    KEW, J
    MORRIS, C
    AIHIE, A
    FYSH, R
    JONES, S
    BROOKS, D
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 306 (6876) : 506 - 507
  • [9] Dietary exposures to selected metals and pesticides
    MacIntosh, DL
    Spengler, JD
    Ozkaynak, H
    Tsai, LH
    Ryan, PB
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1996, 104 (02) : 202 - 209
  • [10] HERBAL MEDICINE AS A CAUSE OF COMBINED LEAD AND ARSENIC POISONING
    MITCHELLHEGGS, CAW
    CONWAY, M
    CASSAR, J
    [J]. HUMAN & EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY, 1990, 9 (03): : 195 - 196