Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape-based model of vision

被引:114
作者
Riesenhuber, M
Jarudi, I
Gilad, S
Sinha, P
机构
[1] MIT, McGovern Inst Brain Res, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[2] MIT, Ctr Biol & Computat Learning, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[3] MIT, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[4] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosci, Washington, DC 20007 USA
关键词
computational neuroscience; neuroscience; object recognition; faces; psychophysics; inversion effect;
D O I
10.1098/rsbl.2004.0216
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Understanding how the human visual system recognizes objects is one of the key challenges in neuroscience. Inspired by a large body of physiological evidence, a general class of recognition models has emerged, which is based on a hierarchical organization of visual processing, with succeeding stages being sensitive to image features of increasing complexity. However, these models appear to be incompatible with some well-known psychophysical results. Prominent among these are experiments investigating recognition impairments caused by vertical inversion of images, especially those of faces. It has been reported that faces that differ 'featurally' are much easier to distinguish when inverted than those that differ 'configurally'; a finding that is difficult to reconcile with the physiological models. Here, we show that after controlling for subjects' expectations, there is no difference between 'featurally' and 'configurally' transformed faces in terms of inversion effect. This result reinforces the plausibility of simple hierarchical models of object representation and recognition in the cortex.
引用
收藏
页码:S448 / S450
页数:3
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces [J].
Blanz, V ;
Vetter, T .
SIGGRAPH 99 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 1999, :187-194
[2]   WHY FACES ARE AND ARE NOT SPECIAL - AN EFFECT OF EXPERTISE [J].
DIAMOND, R ;
CAREY, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1986, 115 (02) :107-117
[3]   WHAT CAUSES THE FACE INVERSION EFFECT [J].
FARAH, MJ ;
TANAKA, JW ;
DRAIN, HM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1995, 21 (03) :628-634
[4]   Distributed Hierarchical Processing in the Primate Cerebral Cortex [J].
Felleman, Daniel J. ;
Van Essen, David C. .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 1991, 1 (01) :1-47
[5]   The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence [J].
Freire, A ;
Lee, K ;
Symons, LA .
PERCEPTION, 2000, 29 (02) :159-170
[6]   RECEPTIVE FIELDS, BINOCULAR INTERACTION AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN CATS VISUAL CORTEX [J].
HUBEL, DH ;
WIESEL, TN .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1962, 160 (01) :106-&
[7]   Neuroperception - Early visual experience and face processing [J].
Le Grand, R ;
Mondloch, CJ ;
Maurer, D ;
Brent, HP .
NATURE, 2001, 410 (6831) :890-890
[8]   SEGREGATION OF FORM, COLOR, MOVEMENT, AND DEPTH - ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, AND PERCEPTION [J].
LIVINGSTONE, M ;
HUBEL, D .
SCIENCE, 1988, 240 (4853) :740-749
[9]   Visual object recognition [J].
Logothetis, NK ;
Sheinberg, DL .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1996, 19 :577-621
[10]   Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing [J].
Mondloch, CJ ;
Le Grand, R ;
Maurer, D .
PERCEPTION, 2002, 31 (05) :553-566