Investigating consumers' tendency to combine multiple shopping purposes and destinations

被引:101
作者
Dellaert, BGC [1 ]
Arentze, TA
Bierlaire, M
Borgers, AWJ
Timmermans, HJP
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Ctr Econ Res, Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, Econ Inst Tilburg, Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Urban Planning Grp, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
[4] MIT, ITS Program, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3151846
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Because of the increasing time pressure they face, many consumers are becoming more concerned about the efficiency of their shopping patterns. Retailers have recognized this trend and have improved shopping convenience by offering greater variety in product categories and making it easier for consumers to combine visits to multiple stores. However, little is known about how consumers improve the efficiency of their shopping trips or how changes in retail supply affect the way in which consumers combine multiple purposes and destinations. Building on previous work in consumer shopping trip modeling and conjoint design theory, the authors introduce a choice-based conjoint approach to studying and modeling this phenomenon. The authors illustrate the approach in a case study that investigates the tendency of Dutch shoppers to combine grocery, drugstore, and clothing purchases across multiple shopping destinations. The authors observe that the tendency of consumers to combine purchases differs from category to category and depends on category availability. In general, consumers combine considerably fewer purchases than could be expected if their shopping trip planning was based purely on travel cost minimization.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 188
页数:12
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Arentze T., 1993, PAPERS REGIONAL SCI, V72, P239, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01434275
  • [2] Ben-Akiva M., 1985, Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand
  • [3] BIERLAIRE M, 1995, 953 GRT FUNDP DEP MA
  • [4] Borgers A., 1996, INT J RES MARK, V13, P251
  • [5] BUNCH DS, 1989, TRANSPORTATION RES B, V25, P1
  • [6] Carson R.T., 1994, MARKET LETT, V5, P351, DOI [10.1007/BF00999210, DOI 10.1007/BF00999210]
  • [7] Dellaert B., 1997, J RETAIL CONSUM SERV, V4, P25
  • [8] Dennis, 1996, NUMERICAL METHODS UN
  • [9] MARKET TRANSACTIONS AND HYPOTHETICAL DEMAND DATA - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY
    DICKIE, M
    FISHER, A
    GERKING, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1987, 82 (397) : 69 - 75
  • [10] GHOSH A, 1984, GEOGR ANAL, V16, P244