The limits of spectatorial folk psychology

被引:100
作者
Hutto, DD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hertfordshire, Dept Humanities, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Herts, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.0268-1064.2004.00272.x
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
It is almost universally agreed that the main business of commonsense psychology is that of providing generally reliable predictions and explanations of the actions of others. In line with this, it is also generally assumed that we are normally at theoretical remove from others such that we are always ascribing causally efficacious mental states to them for the purpose of prediction, explanation and control. Building on the work of those who regard our primary intersubjective interactions as a form of 'embodied practice', I defend a second-personal approach in this paper.
引用
收藏
页码:548 / 573
页数:26
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1955, Aristotle
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Interpreting minds: The evolution of a practice
[3]  
[Anonymous], RECREATIVE MINDS
[4]  
Baker L.R., 1995, EXPLAINING ATTITUDES
[5]  
BAKER LR, 1999, PHILOS EXPLOR, V1, P3
[6]  
Baron-Cohen S., 1992, MIND LANGUAGE, V7, P172, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0017.1992.TB00203.X
[7]  
Baron-Cohen S., 1995, MINDBLINDNESS ESSAY, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/4635.001.0001
[8]  
Bermudez J.L., 1998, PARADOX SELF CONSCIO
[9]  
BOTTERILL G, 1996, THEORIES THEORIES MI
[10]  
Bruner, 1990, ACTS MEANING