Improving immunisation coverage in rural India: clustered randomised controlled evaluation of immunisation campaigns with and without incentives

被引:277
作者
Banerjee, Abhijit Vinayak [1 ]
Duflo, Esther [1 ]
Glennerster, Rachel [2 ]
Kothari, Dhruva
机构
[1] MIT, Dept Econ, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[2] MIT, Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Act Lab, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2010年 / 340卷
关键词
PRIMARY-HEALTH-CARE; IMPACT; INTERVENTIONS; VACCINATION; COUNTRIES; DEMAND; GROWTH; CASH;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.c2220
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the efficacy of modest non-financial incentives on immunisation rates in children aged 1-3 and to compare it with the effect of only improving the reliability of the supply of services. Design Clustered randomised controlled study. Setting Rural Rajasthan, India. Participants 1640 children aged 1-3 at end point. Interventions 134 villages were randomised to one of three groups: a once monthly reliable immunisation camp (intervention A; 379 children from 30 villages); a once monthly reliable immunisation camp with small incentives (raw lentils and metal plates for completed immunisation; intervention B; 382 children from 30 villages), or control (no intervention, 860 children in 74 villages). Surveys were undertaken in randomly selected households at baseline and about 18 months after the interventions started (end point). Main outcome measures Proportion of children aged 1-3 at the end point who were partially or fully immunised. Results Among children aged 1-3 in the end point survey, rates of full immunisation were 39% (148/382, 95% confidence interval 30% to 47%) for intervention B villages (reliable immunisation with incentives), 18% (68/379, 11% to 23%) for intervention A villages (reliable immunisation without incentives), and 6% (50/860, 3% to 9%) for control villages. The relative risk of complete immunisation for intervention B versus control was 6.7 (4.5 to 8.8) and for intervention B versus intervention A was 2.2 (1.5 to 2.8). Children in areas neighbouring intervention B villages were also more likely to be fully immunised than those from areas neighbouring intervention A villages (1.9, 1.1 to 2.8). The average cost per immunisation was $28 (1102 rupees, about 16 pound or (sic)19) in intervention A and $56 (2202 rupees) in intervention B. Conclusions Improving reliability of services improves immunisation rates, but the effect remains modest. Small incentives have large positive impacts on the uptake of immunisation services in resource poor areas and are more cost effective than purely improving supply.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Abhijit Banerjee Abhijit Banerjee, 2004, Economic and Political Weekly, V39, P944
  • [2] The Value of Vaccination
    Bloom, David E.
    [J]. HOT TOPICS IN INFECTION AND IMMUNITY IN CHILDREN VII, 2011, 697 : 1 - 8
  • [3] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2002, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V51, P1
  • [4] COHEN J, 2007, 11 BROOK I
  • [5] Coutinho L, 2000, ECON POLIT WEEKLY, V35, P656
  • [6] *EXPR HEALTHC MAN, 2006, HLTH BUDG 2006 07 NE
  • [7] Role of cash in conditional cash transfer programmes for child health, growth, and development:: an analysis of Mexico's Oportunidades
    Fernald, Lia C. H.
    Gertler, Paul J.
    Neufeld, Lynnette M.
    [J]. LANCET, 2008, 371 (9615) : 828 - 837
  • [8] FILMER D, 2009, POLICY RES WORKING P, V4999
  • [9] Glass Aaron., 2009, Photography, Anthropology, and History: Expanding the Frame, P89
  • [10] GRABOWSKI M, 2005, GHANA ZAMBIA ACHIEVI