The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire - Reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients

被引:302
作者
Atroshi, I [1 ]
Gummesson, C
Andersson, B
Dahlgren, E
Johansson, A
机构
[1] Hassleholm Kristianstad Hosp, Dept Orthoped, SE-29185 Kristianstad, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Lund, Sweden
[3] Hassleholm Kristianstad Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Kristianstad, Sweden
[4] Primary Care, Eslov, Sweden
来源
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA | 2000年 / 71卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/000164700317362262
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire is a self-administered region-specific outcome instrument developed to measure upper-extremity disability and symptoms. The DASH consists mainly of a 30-item disability/symptom scale. We performed cross-cultural adaptation of the DASH to Swedish, using a process that included double forward and backward translations, expert and lay review as well as field-testing to achieve linguistic and conceptual equivalence. The Swedish version's reliability and validity were then evaluated in 176 patients with upper-extremity con ditions. The patients completed the DASH and SF-12 generic health questionnaire before elective surgery or physical therapy. Internal consistency of the DASH was high (Cronbach alpha 0.96). Test-retest reliability, evaluated in a subgroup of 67 patients who completed the DASH on two occasions, with a median interval of 7 days, was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.92). Construct validity was shown by a positive correlation of DASH scores with the SF-12 scores (worse upper-extremity disability correlating with worse general health), stronger correlation with the SF-12 physical than with the mental health component, correlation of worse DASH scores with worse self-rated global health, and ability to discriminate among conditions known to differ in severity. The Swedish version of the DASH is a reliable and val id instrument that can provide a standardized measure of patient-centered outcomes in upper extremity musculoskeletal conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 618
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1999, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V81A, P732
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1999, DASH OUTCOME MEASURE
  • [3] Symptoms, disability, and quality of life in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome
    Atroshi, I
    Gummesson, C
    Johnsson, R
    Sprinchorn, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1999, 24A (02): : 398 - 404
  • [4] Comparative responsiveness of generic versus disease-specific and weighted versus unweighted health status measures in carpal tunnel syndrome
    Bessette, L
    Sangha, O
    Kuntz, KM
    Keller, RB
    Lew, RA
    Fossel, AH
    Katz, JN
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (04) : 491 - 502
  • [5] The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment instrument - Reliability and validity tests
    Daltroy, LH
    CatsBaril, WL
    Katz, JN
    Fossel, AH
    Liang, MH
    [J]. SPINE, 1996, 21 (06) : 741 - 748
  • [6] Davis A M, 1999, J Hand Ther, V12, P269
  • [7] Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery
    Dawson, J
    Fitzpatrick, R
    Carr, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1996, 78B (04): : 593 - 600
  • [8] OUTCOME MEASURES FOR STUDYING PATIENTS WITH LOW-BACK-PAIN
    DEYO, RA
    ANDERSSON, G
    BOMBARDIER, C
    CHERKIN, DC
    KELLER, RB
    LEE, CK
    LIANG, MH
    LIPSCOMB, B
    SHEKELLE, P
    SPRATT, KF
    WEINSTEIN, JN
    [J]. SPINE, 1994, 19 (18) : S2032 - S2036
  • [9] REPRODUCIBILITY AND RESPONSIVENESS OF HEALTH-STATUS MEASURES - STATISTICS AND STRATEGIES FOR EVALUATION
    DEYO, RA
    DIEHR, P
    PATRICK, DL
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1991, 12 (04): : S142 - S158
  • [10] Occupational upper extremity disorders in the federal workforce - Prevalence, health care expenditures, and patterns of work disability
    Feuerstein, M
    Miller, VL
    Burrell, LM
    Berger, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1998, 40 (06) : 546 - 555