The association of cancer survival with four socioeconomic indicators: a longitudinal study of the older population of England and Wales 1981-2000

被引:35
作者
Sloggett, Andrew [1 ]
Young, Harriet [1 ]
Grundy, Emily [1 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London WC1, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2407-7-20
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Many studies have found socioeconomic differentials in cancer survival. Previous studies have generally demonstrated poorer cancer survival with decreasing socioeconomic status but mostly used only ecological measures of status and analytical methods estimating simple survival. This study investigate socio-economic differentials in cancer survival using four indicators of socioeconomic status; three individual and one ecological. It uses a relative survival method which gives a measure of excess mortality due to cancer. Methods: This study uses prospective record linkage data from The Office for National Statistics Longitudinal Study for England and Wales. The participants are Longitudinal Study members, recorded at census in 1971 and 1981 and with a primary malignant cancer diagnosed at age 45 or above, between 1981 and 1997, with follow-up until end 2000. The outcome measure is relative survival/excess mortality, compared with age and sex adjusted survival of the general population. Relative survival and Poisson regression analyses are presented, giving models of relative excess mortality, adjusted for covariates. Results: Different socioeconomic indicators detect survival differentials of varying magnitude and definition. For all cancers combined, the four indicators show similar effects. For individual cancers there are differences between indicators. Where there is an association, all indicators show poorer survival with lower socioeconomic status. Conclusion: Cancer survival differs markedly by socio-economic status. The commonly used ecological measure, the Carstairs Index, is adequate at demonstrating socioeconomic differentials in survival for combined cancers and some individual cancers. A combination of car access and housing tenure is more sensitive than the ecological Carstairs measure at detecting socioeconomic effects on survival - confirming Carstairs effects where they occur but additionally identifying effects for other cancers. Social class is a relatively weak indicator of survival differentials.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
BLACKWELL L, 2003, SERIES LS, V10
[2]   Relation between socioeconomic status and tumour stage in patients with breast, colorectal, ovarian, and lung cancer: results from four national, population based studies [J].
Brewster, DH ;
Thomson, CS ;
Hole, DJ ;
Black, RJ ;
Stroner, PL ;
Gillis, CR .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7290) :830-831
[3]   RELATION BETWEEN SOCIOECONOMIC DEPRIVATION AND PATHOLOGICAL PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN WOMEN WITH BREAST-CANCER [J].
CARNON, AG ;
SSEMWOGERERE, A ;
LAMONT, DW ;
HOLE, DJ ;
MALLON, EA ;
GEORGE, WD ;
GILLIS, CR .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6961) :1054-1057
[4]   DEPRIVATION AND MORTALITY - AN ALTERNATIVE TO SOCIAL-CLASS [J].
CARSTAIRS, V ;
MORRIS, R .
COMMUNITY MEDICINE, 1989, 11 (03) :210-219
[5]  
Coleman MP, 2001, CANCER, V91, P208, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010101)91:1+<208::AID-CNCR6>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-E
[7]  
COLEMAN MP, 1999, STUDIES MED POPULATI, V61
[8]   Regression models for relative survival [J].
Dickman, PW ;
Sloggett, A ;
Hills, M ;
Hakulinen, T .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2004, 23 (01) :51-64
[9]   Measuring social class differences in cancer patient survival: Is it necessary to control for social class differences in general population mortality? A Finnish population-based study [J].
Dickman, PW ;
Auvinen, A ;
Voutilainen, ET ;
Hakulinen, T .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1998, 52 (11) :727-734
[10]   RELATIVE SURVIVAL AND THE ESTIMATION OF NET SURVIVAL - ELEMENTS FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION [J].
ESTEVE, J ;
BENHAMOU, E ;
CROASDALE, M ;
RAYMOND, L .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1990, 9 (05) :529-538