Grandfathering, auctioning and Carbon Leakage: Assessing the inconsistencies of the new ETS Directive

被引:58
作者
Clo, Stefano [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Fac Econ & RIE, I-40124 Bologna, Italy
关键词
Climate Package; Carbon Leakage; Auctioning; EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEME; EU-ETS; ALLOCATION; ALLOWANCES; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.035
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The new ETS Directive defines three different allocation rules, granting exemption from auctioning to those sectors exposed to the risk of Carbon Leakage. This article analyses the inconsistencies that characterize this new allocation rule and it concludes that the methodology designed to assess the risk of Carbon Leakage is more politically driven than economically grounded. The results of the Carbon Leakage risk assessment reveal that grandfathering is going to be the dominant allocation rule during the third phase also. However, not only the exemption from auctioning is unlikely to mitigate Carbon Leakage, instead of improving the allocation transparency and granting harmonization of higher rules but also the new ETS allocation rule is likely to increase the distortions of competition, worsening rather than improving the harmonization within the ETS. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2420 / 2430
页数:11
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, CLIMATE POLICY CARBO
[2]  
[Anonymous], PROP DEC EUR PARL CO
[3]  
[Anonymous], PROP DIR EUR PARL CO
[4]  
[Anonymous], STRINGENCY DISTRIBUT
[5]  
[Anonymous], RES QUANT ASS SECT N
[6]   The effectiveness of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme [J].
Clo, Stefano .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2009, 9 (03) :227-241
[7]  
Demailly D, 2006, CLIM POLICY, V6, P93
[8]  
European Commission Directorate General for Environment McKinsey& Company Ecofys, 2006, EU ETS REV REP INT C
[9]  
Helm D., 2009, EC POLITICS CLIMATE
[10]  
Hepburn C, 2006, CLIM POLICY, V6, P137