Comparison of concentrations of sulbactam-ampicillin administered by bolus injections or bolus plus continuous infusion in tissues of patients undergoing colorectal surgery

被引:19
作者
Martin, C
Cotin, A
Giraud, A
Beccani-Argème, M
Alliot, P
Mallet, MN
Argème, M
机构
[1] Marseilles Univ Hosp Syst, Nord Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care, Marseille, France
[2] Marseilles Med Sch, Marseille, France
[3] Salvator Hosp, Dept Microbiol, Marseille, France
[4] Hop Nord, Dept Surg, F-13915 Marseille 20, France
关键词
D O I
10.1128/AAC.42.5.1093
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The concentrations of sulbactam and ampicillin were determined in sera and different abdominal tissues of 16 patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups. At the time of induction of anesthesia, patients in group 1 (eight patients) were given 1,000 mg of sulbactam with 2,000 mg of ampicillin by intravenous bolus injection (3 min). This dose was administered again after 2 h by bolus injection by the same route, Patients in group 2 (eight patients) were given the same initial dose of sulbactam-ampicillin by bolus injection (3 min), Then, a continuous infusion of 1,000 mg of sulbactam with 2,000 mg of ampicillin in normal saline was immediately started and was administered over a 4-h period, Blood samples were collected to determine peak (10 min) and trough tend of surgery) antibiotic levels. Serial blood samples were also collected at predetermined periods (at the time of opening and closing of the abdominal cavity and at the time of surgical anastomosis). Abdominal wall fat, epiploic fat, and colonic wall tissue samples were collected simultaneously. Antibiotic concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, Similar levels of the drugs in serum were observed for the two regimens of administration, with trough sulbactam levels of 33 +/- 16 and 37 +/- 22 mu g/ml in groups 1 and 2, respectively, and trough ampicillin levels of 72 +/- 55 and 79 +/- 47 mu g/ml in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Similar sulbactam concentrations were observed in abdominal tissues whichever regimen of administration was used; in fatty tissues the sulbactam concentrations ranged from 2.7 to 3.8 mu g/g for group 1 and from 1.7 to 4.0 mu g/g for group 2, and sulbactam concentrations in the colonic wall were 5.6 +/- 7.7 and 6.8 +/- 3.2 mu g/g in groups 1 and 2, respectively (not significant). Again, no influence of the regimen of administration was observed on tissue ampicillin concentrations; in fatty tissues ampicillin concentrations ranged from 4.1 to 5.4 mu g/g for group 1 and from 3.2 to 5.8 mu g/g for group 2, and sulbactam concentrations in the colonic wall were 7.0 +/- 2.8 and 11.0 +/- 4.7 mu g/g for groups 1 and 2, respectively (not significant). In most patients, the concentrations of ampicillin-sulbactam were greater than the MIC at which 50% of isolates are inhibited (MIC50) for Bacteroides fragilis in the fatty tissues. In the colonic wall, for most patients the concentrations of ampicillin-sulbactam were greater than the MIG,, for B. fragilis. No influence of the regimen of administration was observed on the ratio of the two components in the tissues investigated and in sera. In conclusion, a second intraoperative bolus injection or a continuous infusion were equally effective in maintaining sulbactam-ampicillin concentrations in abdominal tissues, The first method of administration can be recommended since it is easier to handle.
引用
收藏
页码:1093 / 1097
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Comparative in vitro activities of trovafloxacin (CP 99,219) and other antimicrobials against clinically significant anaerobes [J].
Aldridge, KE ;
Ashcraft, D ;
Bowman, KA .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1997, 41 (02) :484-487
[2]   Efficacy of ampicillin-sulbactam is not dependent upon maintenance of a critical ratio between components: Sulbactam pharmacokinetics in pharmacodynamic interactions [J].
Alexov, M ;
Lister, PD ;
Sanders, CC .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, 40 (11) :2468-2477
[3]   COMPARATIVE ACTIVITY OF BETA-LACTAMASE INHIBITORS YTR 830, CLAVULANATE, AND SULBACTAM COMBINED WITH BETA-LACTAMS AGAINST BETA-LACTAMASE-PRODUCING ANAEROBES [J].
APPELBAUM, PC ;
JACOBS, MR ;
SPANGLER, SK ;
YAMABE, S .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1986, 30 (05) :789-791
[4]   A SURVEY OF CLINICAL-TRIALS OF ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS IN COLON SURGERY - EVIDENCE AGAINST FURTHER USE OF NO-TREATMENT CONTROLS [J].
BAUM, ML ;
ANISH, DS ;
CHALMERS, TC ;
SACKS, HS ;
SMITH, H ;
FAGERSTROM, RM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1981, 305 (14) :795-799
[5]   HIGH-PRESSURE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHIC ASSAY OF SULBACTAM IN PLASMA, URINE, AND TISSUE [J].
BAWDON, RE ;
MADSEN, PO .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1986, 30 (02) :231-233
[6]   Continuous infusion versus intermittent administration of ceftazidime in critically ill patients with suspected gram-negative infections [J].
Benko, AS ;
Cappelletty, DM ;
Kruse, JA ;
Rybak, MJ .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, 40 (03) :691-695
[7]   THE IMPORTANCE OF TISSUE ANTIBIOTIC-ACTIVITY IN THE PREVENTION OF OPERATIVE WOUND-INFECTION [J].
BERGAMINI, TM ;
POLK, HC .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1989, 23 (03) :301-313
[8]   COMPARATIVE PHARMACOKINETICS AND TISSUE PENETRATION OF SULBACTAM AND AMPICILLIN AFTER CONCURRENT INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION [J].
BROWN, RM ;
WISE, R ;
ANDREWS, JM ;
HANCOX, J .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1982, 21 (04) :565-567
[9]  
BURKE JF, 1961, SURGERY, V50, P161
[10]   SULBACTAM AMPICILLIN COMPARED WITH CEFOXITIN FOR CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS IN ELECTIVE COLORECTAL SURGERY [J].
DELAHUNT, MN ;
KARRAN, SJ ;
CHIR, M .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1986, 29 (03) :157-159