Two distinct types of repression domain in Engrailed: One interacts with the Groucho corepressor and is preferentially active on integrated target genes

被引:135
作者
Tolkunova, EN [1 ]
Fujioka, M [1 ]
Kobayashi, M [1 ]
Deka, D [1 ]
Jaynes, JB [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Kimmel Canc Inst, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/MCB.18.5.2804
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Active transcriptional repression has been characterized as a function of many regulatory factors. It facilitates combinatorial regulation of gene expression by allowing repressors to be dominant over activators under certain conditions. Here, we show that the Engrailed protein uses two distinct mechanisms to repress transcription, One activity is predominant under normal transient transfection assay conditions in cultured cells. A second activity is predominant in an in vivo active repression assay. The domain mediating the in vivo activity (eh1) is highly conserved throughout several classes of homeoproteins and interacts specifically with the Groucho corepressor, While eh1 shows only weak activity in transient transfections, much stronger activity is seen in culture when an integrated target gene is used. In this assay, the relative activities of different repression domains closely parallel those seen in vivo, with eh1 showing the predominant activity. Reducing the amounts of repressor and target gene in a transient transfection assay also increases the sensitivity of the assay to the Groucho interaction domain, albeit to a lesser extent. This suggests that it utilizes rate-limiting components that are relatively low in abundance. Since Groucho itself is abundant in these cells, the results suggest that a limiting component is recruited effectively by the repressor-corepressor complex only on integrated target genes.
引用
收藏
页码:2804 / 2814
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Groucho-dependent and -independent repression activities of runt domain proteins [J].
Aronson, BD ;
Fisher, AL ;
Blechman, K ;
Caudy, M ;
Gergen, JP .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 1997, 17 (09) :5581-5587
[2]   A PURIFIED DROSOPHILA HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN REPRESSES TRANSCRIPTION INVITRO [J].
BIGGIN, MD ;
TJIAN, R .
CELL, 1989, 58 (03) :433-440
[3]   THE SEQUENCE SPECIFICITY OF HOMEODOMAIN-DNA INTERACTION [J].
DESPLAN, C ;
THEIS, J ;
OFARRELL, PH .
CELL, 1988, 54 (07) :1081-1090
[4]  
DIMITRI P, 1989, GENETICS, V122, P793
[5]   ALTERATION OF HSP82 GENE-EXPRESSION BY THE GYPSY TRANSPOSON AND SUPPRESSOR GENES IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER [J].
DORSETT, D ;
VIGLIANTI, GA ;
RUTLEDGE, BJ ;
MESELSON, M .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 1989, 3 (04) :454-468
[6]   THE RETINOBLASTOMA PROTEIN ASSOCIATES WITH THE PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE TYPE-1 CATALYTIC SUBUNIT [J].
DURFEE, T ;
BECHERER, K ;
CHEN, PL ;
YEH, SH ;
YANG, YZ ;
KILBURN, AE ;
LEE, WH ;
ELLEDGE, SJ .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 1993, 7 (04) :555-569
[7]   THE 3 POSTBLASTODERM CELL-CYCLES OF DROSOPHILA EMBRYOGENESIS ARE REGULATED IN G2 BY STRING [J].
EDGAR, BA ;
OFARRELL, PH .
CELL, 1990, 62 (03) :469-480
[8]  
Fisher AL, 1996, MOL CELL BIOL, V16, P2670
[9]  
Fujioka M, 1995, DEVELOPMENT, V121, P4371
[10]   The nuclear receptor homologue Ftz-F1 and the homeodomain protein Ftz are mutually dependent cofactors [J].
Guichet, A ;
Copeland, JWR ;
Erdelyi, M ;
Hlousek, D ;
Zavorszky, P ;
Ho, J ;
Brown, S ;
PercivalSmith, A ;
Krause, HM ;
Ephrussi, A .
NATURE, 1997, 385 (6616) :548-552