Estimating the costs of conserving a biodiversity hotspot: a case-study of the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa

被引:84
作者
Frazee, SR
Cowling, RM
Pressey, RL
Turpie, JK
Lindenberg, N
机构
[1] Univ Port Elizabeth, So African Hotspots Program Conservat Int, Dept Bot, ZA-6000 Port Elizabeth, South Africa
[2] Univ Port Elizabeth, Terr Ecol Res Unit, ZA-6000 Port Elizabeth, South Africa
[3] Univ Cape Town, Percy Fitzpatrick Inst African Ornithol, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa
[4] New S Wales Natl Parks & Wildlife Serv, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
[5] Univ Cape Town, Informat Technol Serv, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa
关键词
conservation management costs; off-reserve conservation; protected area costs; restoration costs; systematic conservation planning;
D O I
10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00400-7
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The lack of realistic estimates of the costs of protected area establishment and effective management can hinder conservation planning and result in under-funded "paper parks" that fail to meet conservation goals. This study comprises the first comprehensive and systematic estimate of the costs of conserving a globally recognised biodiversity hotspot, the Cape Floristic Region. To our knowledge, it is also the first study to use specific relationships between protected area attributes and management costs to estimate the long-term costs of implementing a regional conservation plan. We derived a configuration for an expanded protected area system and two off-reserve mechanisms (contractual reserves and other incentive mechanisms) that achieve explicit conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process identified in a systematic conservation planning process. Using a costing model, we then estimated the costs of establishing and maintaining this reserve system. Although the reserve system is one of many potential configurations that may achieve the designated conservation targets, the results indicate that the costs of conservation are substantial. An expenditure of $45.6 million per year, assuming a 20-year implementation horizon, is required to develop a representative reserve system, while the annual costs of maintaining this system are $24.4 million. Owing to the economies of scale, especially the marked increase in unit management costs when protected area size < 600 ha, the predicted cost of managing the expanded system was only 1.2 times that of the existing system. Overall, the level of expenditure required to effectively conserve the region's biodiversity is low relative to its regional and global significance. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 290
页数:16
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] Integrating costs of conservation into international priority setting
    Balmford, A
    Gaston, KJ
    Rodrigues, ASL
    James, A
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2000, 14 (03) : 597 - 605
  • [2] Why biodiversity surveys are good value
    Balmford, A
    Gaston, KJ
    [J]. NATURE, 1999, 398 (6724) : 204 - 205
  • [3] Ecology - Economic reasons for conserving wild nature
    Balmford, A
    Bruner, A
    Cooper, P
    Costanza, R
    Farber, S
    Green, RE
    Jenkins, M
    Jefferiss, P
    Jessamy, V
    Madden, J
    Munro, K
    Myers, N
    Naeem, S
    Paavola, J
    Rayment, M
    Rosendo, S
    Roughgarden, J
    Trumper, K
    Turner, RK
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5583) : 950 - 953
  • [4] BALMFORD A, UNPUB P NATL ACAD SC
  • [5] BALMFORD A, 1998, CONSERVATION CHANGIN, P1
  • [6] BINNING CE, 1997, FRONTIERS ECOLOGY BU, P155
  • [7] WHEN IS AN ISLAND NOT AN ISLAND - INSULAR EFFECTS AND THEIR CAUSES IN FYNBOS SHRUBLANDS
    BOND, WJ
    MIDGLEY, J
    VLOK, J
    [J]. OECOLOGIA, 1988, 77 (04) : 515 - 521
  • [8] BOSHOFF A, 2000, BAVIAANSKLOOF CONSER
  • [9] BOWERS D, 1997, POLICY INSTRUMENTS C
  • [10] BURGERS C, 1998, NEED RESTRUCTURING C