Effects on breast MRI of artifacts caused by metallic tissue marker clips

被引:57
作者
Genson, Charles C. [1 ]
Blane, Caroline E. [1 ]
Helvie, Mark A. [1 ]
Waits, Seth A. [1 ]
Chenevert, Thomas L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
artifact; breast; breast cancer; MRI; tissue marker clips;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.05.1254
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to investigate MR artifacts related to tissue marker clips used in breast imaging procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Breast phantoms were created using gelatin doped with gadolinium. Four commercially available tissue marker clips were evaluated. Clinical MR evaluation of all phantoms with 1.5-T gradient-recalled echo sequences was performed. Images were evaluated for size and character of the visible artifacts and graphically appreciable fat saturation inhomogeneities. Quantitative measurement of the local inhomogeneity in 3D parts per million maps was obtained as a function of distance from each tissue marker. RESULTS. All tissue marker clips caused signal void artifacts on non-fat-suppressed images that measured 2 - 6 times the clip diameter. The degree of fat suppression inhomogeneity was minor but clinically appreciable. The local clip-induced field inhomogeneity varied from 0.25 to greater than 4.0 PPM for the four clips. At 0.25 PPM, the zonal diameter of frequency shift varied from 6 mm to 44 mm. CONCLUSION. Artifacts caused by tissue marker clips could limit the sensitivity of MRI for detection and follow-up of breast cancer. The local effects on field inhomogeneity will affect local fat suppression and make spectroscopy data less reliable. These effects, though small, are measurable and vary among the different clips evaluated.
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 376
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
*ART MED, ETH END WEB SIT
[2]
Proton MR spectroscopy in clinical routine [J].
Burtscher, IM ;
Holtås, S .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 13 (04) :560-567
[3]
Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: Evidence for improved preoperative staging [J].
Esserman, L ;
Hylton, N ;
Yassa, L ;
Barclay, J ;
Frankel, S ;
Sickles, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (01) :110-119
[4]
Breast carcinoma: Effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach [J].
Fischer, U ;
Kopka, L ;
Grabbe, E .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (03) :881-888
[5]
Coronary arterial stents: Safety and artifacts during MR imaging [J].
Hug, J ;
Nagel, E ;
Bornstedt, A ;
Schnackenburg, B ;
Oswald, H ;
Fleck, E .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (03) :781-787
[6]
*INRAD PROD INF, INRAD WEB SIT
[7]
Signal intensity artifacts in clinical MR imaging [J].
Jones, RW ;
Witte, RJ .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2000, 20 (03) :893-901
[8]
Katz-Brull R, 2002, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V94, P1197
[9]
Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition [J].
Kriege, M ;
Brekelmans, CTM ;
Boetes, C ;
Besnard, PE ;
Zonderland, HM ;
Obdeijn, IM ;
Manoliu, RA ;
Kok, T ;
Peterse, H ;
Tilanus-Linthorst, MMA ;
Muller, SH ;
Meijer, S ;
Oosterwijk, JC ;
Beex, LVAM ;
Tollenaar, RAEM ;
de Koning, HJ ;
Rutgers, EJT ;
Klijn, JGM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (05) :427-437
[10]
MR imaging-guided large-core (14-gauge) needle biopsy of small lesions visible at breast MR imaging alone [J].
Kuhl, CK ;
Morakkabati, N ;
Leutner, CC ;
Schmiedel, A ;
Wardelmann, E ;
Schild, HH .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (01) :31-39