Knowledge, uncertainty and physical geography: towards the development of methodologies for questioning belief

被引:83
作者
Brown, JD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Inst Biodivers & Ecosyst Dynam, NL-1018 WV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
imperfect knowledge; uncertainty; critical realism; closure;
D O I
10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00342.x
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Although it is widely acknowledged that our understanding of environmental systems cannot be reduced to single predictions and unique explanations, determinism remains a common strategy in physical geography. This paper argues for explicit assessments of uncertainty in environmental data and models as a necessary, although not a sufficient, condition for balancing uncertain scientific arguments against uncertain social, ethical, moral and legal arguments in managing environmental systems. In particular, this paper aims to: (1) demonstrate the importance of assessing uncertainty within a realist research framework; (2) consider the nature of scientific uncertainty as the basis for developing methodologies that question belief; and (3) explore some important aspects of a methodology for evaluating uncertainties in environmental research.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 381
页数:15
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
Adams J., 1995, RISK
[2]  
Agnew C. T., 1995, People and environment in Africa., P137
[3]  
[Anonymous], ECOLOGY UNCERTAINTY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1986, PHYS GEOGRAPHY ITS N
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1993, MODELLING HUMAN IMPA
[6]  
[Anonymous], ECOLOGICAL EC
[7]  
Ayyub BM, 2001, ELICITATION EXPERT O
[8]   On methodology in physical geography - Current status, implications, and future prospects [J].
Bauer, BO .
ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 1999, 89 (04) :677-679
[9]  
Beck B, 2002, ENCY ENV, P1275
[10]  
Beck M.B., 2002, ENV FORESIGHT MODELS