Dissecting contributions to the denaturant sensitivities of proteins

Understanding the molecular basis for protein denaturation by urea and guanidinium chloride (GdmCl) should accommodate the observation that, on a molar basis, GdmCl is generally 2-2.5-fold more effective as a protein denaturant than urea. Previous studies [Smith, J. S., and Scholtz, J. M. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 7292-7297] have suggested that the effects of GdmCl on the stability of alanine-based helical peptides can be separated into denaturant and salt effects, since adding equimolar NaCl to urea enhanced urea-induced unfolding to an extent that was close to that of Gdm. We reinvestigated this observation using art alanine-based helical peptide (alahel) that lacks side chain electrostatic contributions to stability, and compared the relative denaturant sensitivities of this peptide with that of tryptophan zipper. peptides (trpzip) whose native conformations are stabilized largely by cross-strand indole ring interactions. In contrast to the observations of Smith and Scholtz, GdmCl was only slightly more powerful as a denaturant of alahel than urea in salt-free buffer (the denaturant m value m(GdmCl)/m(urea) ratio = 1.4), and the denaturation of alahel by urea exhibited only a small dependence on NaCl or KCl. The trpzip peptides were much more sensitive to GdmG than to urea (m(GdmCl)/m(urea) = 3.5-4). These observations indicate that the m(GmCl)/m(urea) ratio of 2-2.5 for proteins results from a combination of effects on the multiple contributions to protein stability, for which GdmCl may be only slightly more effective than urea (e.g., hydrogen bonds) or considerably more effective than urea (e.g., indole-indole interactions).