Assessment of chromosomal gains and losses in oral squamous cell carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridisation

被引:44
作者
Hermsen, MAJA
Joenje, H [1 ]
Arwert, F
Braakhuis, BJM
Baak, JPA
Westerveld, A
Slater, R
机构
[1] Free Univ Amsterdam, Dept Human Genet, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Free Univ Amsterdam Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Free Univ Amsterdam Hosp, Dept Pathol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Inst Human Genet, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
ORAL ONCOLOGY | 1997年 / 33卷 / 06期
关键词
oral carcinoma; comparative genomic hybridisation; cytogenetics; fluorescence in situ hybridisation;
D O I
10.1016/S0964-1955(97)00031-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Cytogenetic studies have demonstrated that oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) are usually characterised by complex karyotypes with many marker chromosomes. We analysed the genetic changes of six OSCC cell cultures by comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH). The CGH technique provides information on chromosomal gains and losses of the whole tumour genome in a single experiment and can therefore identify regions that harbour putative tumour suppressor genes (in the case of loss of chromosomal material) or oncogenes (in the case of gain or amplification of chromosomal material). Recurrent losses were detected at chromosome arms Xp and 3p (four cases). Gains consistently occurred at chromosome arms 8q and 9q (four cases) and at 1q, 3q, 5p, 7p, and 9p (three cases). The same six tumour cultures have previously been analysed by classical karyotyping. An important discrepancy between the two techniques was the number of losses detected: 55 with karyotyping versus 26 with CGH. On the basis of the cytogenetic complexity of these tumours and on FISH experiments that confirmed the CGH results, we conclude that genetic changes, particularly losses, can be more reliably detected by CGH analysis. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 418
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
BRZOSKA PM, 1995, CANCER RES, V55, P3055
[2]   CYTOGENETIC EVIDENCE OF THE MULTISTEP ORIGIN OF HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMAS [J].
COWAN, JM ;
BECKETT, MA ;
AHMEDSWAN, S ;
WEICHSELBAUM, RR .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1992, 84 (10) :793-797
[3]   The application of microwave denaturation in comparative genomic hybridization [J].
deMeulemeester, M ;
Vink, A ;
Jakobs, M ;
Hermsen, M ;
Steenman, M ;
Slater, R ;
Dietrich, A ;
Mannens, M .
GENETIC ANALYSIS-BIOMOLECULAR ENGINEERING, 1996, 13 (05) :129-133
[4]   DETECTION OF COMPLETE AND PARTIAL CHROMOSOME GAINS AND LOSSES BY COMPARATIVE GENOMIC INSITU HYBRIDIZATION [J].
DUMANOIR, S ;
SPEICHER, MR ;
JOOS, S ;
SCHROCK, E ;
POPP, S ;
DOHNER, H ;
KOVACS, G ;
ROBERTNICOUD, M ;
LICHTER, P ;
CREMER, T .
HUMAN GENETICS, 1993, 90 (06) :590-610
[5]  
Hermsen MAJA, 1996, GENE CHROMOSOME CANC, V15, P1
[6]   HIGH-RESOLUTION LOCALIZATION OF 69 POTENTIAL HUMAN ZINC FINGER PROTEIN GENES - A NUMBER ARE CLUSTERED [J].
HOOVERS, JMN ;
MANNENS, M ;
JOHN, R ;
BLIEK, J ;
VANHEYNINGEN, V ;
PORTEOUS, DJ ;
LESCHOT, NJ ;
WESTERVELD, A ;
LITTLE, PFR .
GENOMICS, 1992, 12 (02) :254-263
[7]  
JIN YS, 1993, CANCER RES, V53, P2140
[8]  
JIN YS, 1995, CANCER RES, V55, P3204
[9]   COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION FOR MOLECULAR CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF SOLID TUMORS [J].
KALLIONIEMI, A ;
KALLIONIEMI, OP ;
SUDAR, D ;
RUTOVITZ, D ;
GRAY, JW ;
WALDMAN, F ;
PINKEL, D .
SCIENCE, 1992, 258 (5083) :818-821
[10]   OPTIMIZING COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION FOR ANALYSIS OF DNA-SEQUENCE COPY NUMBER CHANGES IN SOLID TUMORS [J].
KALLIONIEMI, OP ;
KALLIONIEMI, A ;
PIPER, J ;
ISOLA, J ;
WALDMAN, FM ;
GRAY, JW ;
PINKEL, D .
GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER, 1994, 10 (04) :231-243