A method for assessing quality of control from glucose profiles

被引:102
作者
Hill, N. R.
Hindmarsh, P. C.
Stevens, R. J.
Stratton, I. M.
Levy, J. C.
Matthews, D. R.
机构
[1] Churchill Hosp, Oxford Ctr Diabet Endocrinol & Metab, Headington OX3 7U, England
[2] Inst Child Hlth, Ctr Paediat Endocrinol & Metab, London, England
关键词
CGMS; glucose assessment; glucose controlglycaemic index; hyperglycaemia; hypoglycaemia; m-value; risk; OXIDATIVE STRESS; HYPOGLYCEMIA; VARIABILITY; ACTIVATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02119.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim As the practice of multiple assessments of glucose concentration throughout the day increases for people with diabetes, there is a need for an assessment of glycaemic control weighted for the clinical risks of both hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia. Methods We have developed a methodology to report the degree of risk which a glycaemic profile represents. Fifty diabetes professionals assigned risk values to a range of 40 blood glucose concentrations. Their responses were summarised and a generic function of glycaemic risk was derived. This function was applied to patient glucose profiles to generate an integrated risk score termed the Glycaemic Risk Assessment Diabetes Equation (GRADE). The GRADE score was then reported by use of the mean value and the relative percent contribution to the weighted risk score from the hypoglycaemic, euglycaemic, hyperglycaemic range, respectively, e.g. GRADE (hypoglycaemia%, euglycaemia%, hyperglycaemia%). Results The GRADE scores of indicative glucose profiles were as follows: continuous glucose monitoring profile non-diabetic subjects GRADE = 1.1, Type 1 diabetes continuous glucose monitoring GRADE = 8.09 (20%, 8%, 72%), Type 2 diabetes home blood glucose monitoring GRADE = 9.97 (2%, 7%, 91%). Conclusions The GRADE score of a glucose profile summarises the degree of risk associated with a glucose profile. Values < 5 correspond to euglycaemia. The GRADE score is simple to generate from any blood glucose profile and can be used as an adjunct to HbA(1c) to report the degree of risk associated with glycaemic variability.
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 758
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Albisser A Michael, 2005, Diabetes Technol Ther, V7, P863, DOI 10.1089/dia.2005.7.863
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, MOD STAND SERV MOD N
[3]  
[Anonymous], DIABETES CARE S1
[4]  
[Anonymous], MAN TYP 2 DIAB MAN B
[5]  
DCCT Res Grp, 1991, AM J MED, V90, P450, DOI 10.1016/0002-9343(91)80085-Z
[6]  
*DEP HLTH, 2005, NAT TAR 2005 2006 LO
[7]   RECEIVER-OPERATED CHARACTERISTIC CURVE ANALYSIS OF 2 ALGORITHMS ASSESSING HUMAN GROWTH-HORMONE PULSATILE SECRETION (PULSAR, CLUSTER) - COMPARISON OF PEAK DETECTION EFFICACY [J].
HAUFFA, BP ;
STOLECKE, H .
HORMONE RESEARCH, 1994, 41 (5-6) :169-176
[8]   Should minimal blood glucose variability become the gold standard of glycemic control? [J].
Hirsch, IB ;
Brownlee, M .
JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS, 2005, 19 (03) :178-181
[9]   Continuous glucose monitoring and the reality of metabolic control in preschool children with type 1 diabetes [J].
Jeha, GS ;
Karaviti, LP ;
Anderson, B ;
Smith, EO ;
Donaldson, S ;
McGirk, TS ;
Haymond, MW .
DIABETES CARE, 2004, 27 (12) :2881-2886
[10]   Continuous glucose monitoring during pregnancy complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus. [J].
Jovanovic L. .
Current Diabetes Reports, 2001, 1 (1) :82-85