Variation simulation of sheet metal assemblies using the method of influence coefficients with contact modeling

被引:104
作者
Dahlstrom, Stefan
Lindkvist, Lars
机构
[1] Volvo Car Corp, BIW Struct Engn, SE-40531 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Chalmers, Dept Prod & Prod Dev, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
来源
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2007年 / 129卷 / 03期
关键词
variation simulation; sheet metal assemblies; tolerance analysis; contact modeling;
D O I
10.1115/1.2714570
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Sheet metal assembly is a common assembly process for several products such as automobiles and airplanes. Since all manufacturing processes are affected by variation, and products need to have a high geometric quality, geometry-related production problems must be analyzed during early design phases. This paper discusses two methods of performing this analysis. One way of performing the simulations relatively fast is to establish linear relationships between part deviation and assembly springback deviation by using the method of influence coefficient (MIC). However, this method does not consider contact between the parts. This means that the parts are allowed to penetrate each other which can affect the accuracy of the simulation result. This paper presents a simple contact modeling technique that can be implemented in to MIC to avoid penetrations. The contact modeling consists of a contact detection and a contact equilibrium search algorithm. When implemented, MIC still only requires two finite element analysis (FEA) calculations. This paper describes the steps in the contact algorithm and how it can be used in MIC and finally the proposed contact modeling is verified by comparing the simulation result with commercial FEA software ABAQUS contact algorithm.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 622
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, VIRTUAL REALITY SYST
[2]  
BIHLMAIER BF, 1999, THESIS BRINGHAM YOUN
[3]  
CAI W, 2003, P 2003 ASME INT MECH
[4]   Modeling variation propagation of multi-station assembly systems with compliant parts [J].
Camelio, J ;
Hu, SJ ;
Ceglarek, D .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2003, 125 (04) :673-681
[5]   Compliant assembly variation analysis using component geometric covariance [J].
Camelio, JA ;
Hu, SJ ;
Marin, SP .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2004, 126 (02) :355-360
[6]  
Ceglarek, 1997, ASME DESIGN ENG DIVI, V15, P153
[7]   Modeling the assembly of compliant, non-ideal parts [J].
Chang, MH ;
Gossard, DC .
COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 1997, 29 (10) :701-708
[8]  
DAHLSTROM S, 2002, P 4 INT S TOOLS METH
[9]  
DAHLSTROM S, 2003, P 2003 ASME INT MECH
[10]  
LEE J, 2000, P 2002 ASME INT DETC