Bottom-up influences on working memory:: Behavioral and electrophysiological distraction varies with distractor strength

被引:145
作者
Berti, S [1 ]
Roeber, U
Schröger, E
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Psychol, D-55099 Mainz, Germany
[2] Univ Leipzig, Inst Gen Psychol, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
attention; distraction; audition; threshold; mismatch negativity (MMN); P3a; reorienting negativity (RON);
D O I
10.1027/1618-3169.51.4.249
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study investigates bottom-up effects serving the optimal balance between focusing attention on relevant information and distractibility by potentially significant events outside the focus of attention. We tested whether distraction, indicated by behavioral and event-related brain potential (ERP) measures, varies with the strength of task-irrelevant deviances. Twenty subjects performed a tone-duration discrimination task (200 or 400 ms sinusoidal tones presented equiprobably). The stimuli were presented with frequent standard (p = 0.84; 1000 Hz) or infrequent deviant (p = 0.16) pitch. These task-irrelevant pitch changes consisted in a frequency increase/decrease of 1%, 3%, 5%, or 10%. Each of them resulted in prolonged reaction times (RT) in the duration discrimination task and elicited the MMN, P3a, and RON components of the ERP. Importantly, these measures did increase as a function of pitch deviance. Separating the individual trials on the 1% deviation level into trials with and without RT prolongation, i.e., behavioral distraction effect, revealed that both subgroups had similar MMN, but P3a and RON were confined to the trials with RT prolongation. Results are interpreted within a model relating preattentive deviance detection, distraction, and working memory.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 257
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Increased distractibility by task-irrelevant sound changes in abstinent alcoholics [J].
Ahveninen, J ;
Jääskeläinen, IP ;
Pekkonen, E ;
Hallberg, A ;
Hietanen, M ;
Näätänen, R ;
Schröger, E ;
Sillanaukee, P .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 24 (12) :1850-1854
[2]   Exploring the central executive [J].
Baddeley, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 49 (01) :5-28
[3]   Working memory controls involuntary attention switching:: evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm [J].
Berti, S ;
Schröger, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 17 (05) :1119-1122
[4]   A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects:: behavioral and event-related indices [J].
Berti, S ;
Schröger, E .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (03) :265-273
[5]  
Cowan N., 1999, Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control, P62
[6]   The role of working memory in visual selective attention [J].
de Fockert, JW ;
Rees, G ;
Frith, CD ;
Lavie, N .
SCIENCE, 2001, 291 (5509) :1803-1806
[7]   Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention [J].
Downing, PE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2000, 11 (06) :467-473
[8]  
Engle R.W., 1999, MODELS WORKING MEMOR, P102, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139174909.007, 10.1017/CBO9781139174909.007]
[9]   Attention capture by auditory significant stimuli:: semantic analysis follows attention switching [J].
Escera, C ;
Yago, E ;
Corral, MJ ;
Corbera, S ;
Nuñez-Peña, MI .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 18 (08) :2408-2412
[10]   Electrical responses reveal the temporal dynamics of brain events during involuntary attention switching [J].
Escera, C ;
Yago, E ;
Alho, K .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 14 (05) :877-883