Long-term results with different bone substitutes used for sinus floor elevation

被引:67
作者
Velich, N [1 ]
Németh, Z [1 ]
Tóth, C [1 ]
Szabó, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Semmelweis Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
关键词
sinus floor elevation; bone substitutes; dental implantation; complications;
D O I
10.1097/00001665-200401000-00013
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
One of the surgical procedures preceding implantation is elevation of the base of the maxillary Sinus. Numerous bone substituting materials (grafts) may be used for this purpose, including autogenous bone, heterografts, xenogenous bone, and synthetic materials alone or in combination or mixed with growth factors and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) preparations. A study of the frequencies of the failures (graft material resorption or implant loss) after sinus elevations with various graft materials or their combinations was conducted. In the 5-year period from 1996 through 2001, a follow-up investigation of 810 maxillary sinus augmentations was performed, in which the sinus elevations involved the use of autogenous bone, a calcium carbonate-coated polymer, hydroxylapatite of algal origin, calcium carbonate gel produced from coral or D-tricalcium phosphate alone, autogenous bone mixed with these bone substitutes, or a combination of beta-tricalcium phosphate and platelet-rich plasma. The incidences of graft resorption and implant loss after the augmentations with various bone substitutes were recorded. Total resorption (disappearance) of the bone substitute material was observed in 2.7% of the cases. An essential difference was not experienced between the various bone substitutes from this aspect, with the exception of the gel-state calcium carbonate, where 40% of the grafts were resorbed. In total, 5.46% of the implants were lost, the differences between the various materials were not significant.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 41
页数:4
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Artzi Z, 2001, INT J PERIODONT REST, V21, P395
[2]   Sinus augmentation for dental implants: The use of autogenous bone [J].
Block, MS ;
Kent, JN .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1997, 55 (11) :1281-1286
[3]   Histomorphometrical analysis of bone formed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation by grafting with a combination of autogenous bone and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft or hydroxyapatite [J].
Boëck-Neto, R ;
Gabrielli, MFR ;
Lia, RCC ;
Marcantonio, E ;
Shibli, JA ;
Marcantonio, E .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2002, 73 (03) :266-270
[4]   Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using bioactive glass granules and autogenous bone with simultaneous implant placement - Clinical and histological findings [J].
Cordioli, G ;
Mazzocco, C ;
Schepers, E ;
Brugnolo, E ;
Majzoub, Z .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2001, 12 (03) :270-278
[5]  
Hallman M, 2001, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V3, P87, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00236.x
[6]  
Haris A G, 1998, Implant Dent, V7, P287, DOI 10.1097/00008505-199807040-00006
[7]  
Hogan B P, 1996, Dent Implantol Update, V7, P57
[8]  
Hrabák K, 1999, J LONG-TERM EFF MED, V9, P223
[9]   Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys Part 1. Evaluation of anorganic bovine-derived bone matrix [J].
Hurzeler, MB ;
Quinones, CR ;
Kirsch, A ;
Gloker, C ;
Schupbach, P ;
Strub, JR ;
Caffesse, RG .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (06) :476-486
[10]   RECONSTRUCTION OF THE SEVERELY RESORBED MAXILLA WITH BONE-GRAFTING AND OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS - A PRELIMINARY-REPORT [J].
JENSEN, J ;
SIMONSEN, EK ;
SINDETPEDERSEN, S .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1990, 48 (01) :27-32