Repeated thoracentesis:: An important risk factor for eosinophilic pleural effusion?

被引:9
作者
García, MAM [1 ]
Viedma, EC [1 ]
Tordera, MP [1 ]
Sanchis-Aldás, JL [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ La Fe, Serv Pneumol, E-46009 Valencia, Spain
关键词
eosinophilic pleural effusion; repeated thoracentesis; pleural biopsy;
D O I
10.1159/000068415
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Eosinophilic pleural effusion (EPE) is a relatively rare clinical condition. Repeated thoracenteses (RTs) are normally considered a frequent cause of EPE. Yet, to our knowledge, there is no firm evidence (apart from anecdotal case reports) supporting such a statement. Objective: To investigate potential relationships between the number, type (with or without pleural biopsy) and time elapsed between RTs and the number of eosinophils present in pleural fluid samples. Methods: We reviewed retrospectively 273 pleural fluid samples belonging to 120 patients (79 males, 41 females), attended in our institution from 1992 to 2000, whose clinical mangement had required RTs. Apart from the anthropometric and clinical data of each patient, we included the following variables in the analysis: number of thoracenteses performed in each individual, number of pleural biopsies carried out at each thoracentesis and time between consecutive thoracenteses. We also recorded the total (and differential) leukocyte count, red blood cell count, as well as the main biochemical, microbiological and histological data of both the pleural fluid and peripheral blood samples. Results: We did not observe any significant change in the percentage of eosinophils in relation to the number of thoracenteses performed per patient. This lack of relationship was also observed in the subgroup of patients who required one (or more) pleural biopsies (n = 111) (regardless of the number of biopsies). Our results suggest that RTs are not an important risk factor for the development of EPE, regardless of the time elapsed between two thoracenteses. Conclusion: We believe, therefore, that multiple punctures should not longer be considered a prevalent cause of pleural eosinophilia. Copyright (C) 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 86
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   DIAGNOSTIC UTILITY OF PLEURAL FLUID EOSINOPHILIA [J].
ADELMAN, M ;
ALBELDA, SM ;
GOTTLIEB, J ;
HAPONIK, EF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1984, 77 (05) :915-920
[2]   THE EVALUATION OF PLEURAL EFFUSION [J].
BARTTER, T ;
SANTARELLI, R ;
AKERS, SM ;
PRATTER, MR .
CHEST, 1994, 106 (04) :1209-1214
[3]  
CAMPBELL GD, 1964, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V90, P194
[4]   New aspects of degranulation and fates of airway mucosal eosinophils [J].
Erjefält, JS ;
Persson, CGA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 161 (06) :2074-2085
[5]   PROBABILITY OF MALIGNANCY IN PLEURAL FLUID EOSINOPHILIA [J].
KUHN, M ;
FITTING, JW ;
LEUENBERGER, P .
CHEST, 1989, 96 (05) :992-994
[6]   POSTTRAUMATIC PLEURAL-FLUID AND BLOOD EOSINOPHILIA [J].
KUMAR, UN ;
VARKEY, B ;
MATHAI, G .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1975, 234 (06) :625-626
[7]   CELLS IN PLEURAL FLUID - THEIR VALUE IN DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS [J].
LIGHT, RW ;
EROZAN, YS ;
BALL, WC .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1973, 132 (06) :854-860
[8]   Diagnostic principles in pleural disease [J].
Light, RW .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1997, 10 (02) :476-481
[9]  
Light RW, 2000, PLEURAL DIS
[10]   Diagnostic utility of eosinophils in the pleural fluid [J].
Martínez-García, MA ;
Cases-Viedma, E ;
Cordero-Rodríguez, PJ ;
Hidalgo-Ramírez, M ;
Perpiñá-Tordera, M ;
Sanchis-Moret, F ;
Sanchis-Aldás, JL .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2000, 15 (01) :166-169