Map quality and zone delineation as affected by width of parallel swaths of mobile agricultural sensors

被引:16
作者
Farahani, H. J.
Flynn, R. L.
机构
[1] Int Ctr Agr Res Dry Areas, Aleppo, Syria
[2] Colorado State Univ, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.10.010
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
There is an emerging interest in on-the-go mapping of apparent soil electrical conductivity (ECa) as a surrogate spatial map for soil properties. The quality (or precision and accuracy) of ECa maps as affected by the swath width of the commercial ECa sensing platforms has not been fully explored. For a centre pivot field in Colorado, very dense ECa measurements were collected using a mobile ECa sensor. This fine data layer, representing a base (control) ECa data layer with 2.5 m between the centres of adjacent swaths, was then scaled up to produce coarser ECa data layers with swath widths from 5 to 200 in. The patterns of low, medium and high ECa were produced for all data layers and used to compare different maps. All ECa maps were compared to the base ECa map, and statistical measures of map quality were quantified. Results show a 0.4% and 0-2% reduction in map prediction efficiency and map pattern agreement (as compared to the base map), respectively, per metre increased in swath width. Map quality deteriorated slightly as swath width increased to about 50 in, but at swath widths of 80 in and higher, the quality deteriorated severely and map delineations in the form of location-specific low, medium and high ECa zones became highly distorted and wrongly classified. Increasing the manufacturer's recommended swath width range of 12-18 m to a range of 30-50 in caused only a 10% reduction in map quality while reducing the mapping time by 65%. (c) 2006 IAgrE. All rights reserved Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 159
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
AGTERBERG FP, 1984, TREND SURFACE ANAL S, P147, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-3048-8_8
[2]  
COCKX L, 2004, P 7 INT C PREC AGR
[3]  
Deutsch C.V., 1998, GSLIB GEOSTATISTICAL
[4]  
Earl R., 1996, Landwards, V51, P18
[5]  
Farahani HJ, 2004, T ASAE, V47, P79, DOI 10.13031/2013.15873
[6]   Comparison of kriging and inverse-distance methods for mapping soil parameters [J].
Gotway, CA ;
Ferguson, RB ;
Hergert, GW ;
Peterson, TA .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1996, 60 (04) :1237-1247
[7]   Interdisciplinary Irrigated Precision Farming Research [J].
D. F. Heermann ;
J. Hoeting ;
S. E. Thompson ;
H. R. Duke ;
D. G. Westfall ;
G. W. Buchleiter ;
P. Westra ;
F. B. Peairs ;
K. Fleming .
Precision Agriculture, 2002, 3 (1) :47-61
[8]   Determination of soil type boundaries using electromagnetic induction scanning techniques [J].
James, IT ;
Waine, TW ;
Bradley, RI ;
Taylor, JC ;
Godwin, RJ .
BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2003, 86 (04) :421-430
[9]  
KING JA, 2001, 3 EUR C PREC AGR MON, V1, P419
[10]  
KITCHEN NR, 2000, 2 INT GEOSP INF AGR, V2, P122