Dual mobility cups associated with proximal femoral replacement in nontumoral indications: Results and complications

被引:6
作者
Canetti, Robin [1 ]
Malatray, Matthieu [1 ]
Pibarot, Vincent [1 ]
Wegrzyn, Julien [2 ]
机构
[1] Pavillon T Hop Edouard Herriot, Serv Chirurg orthoped, 5 Pl Arsonval, F-69437 Lyon, France
[2] Ctr hosp Univ Vaudois CHUV, Serv Chirurg orthoped, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Dual mobility cup; Proximal femoral bone loss; Proximal femoral replacement; Dislocation; Complication; HIP; ARTHROPLASTY; DISLOCATION; SURGERY; QUALITY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103029
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Introduction: Reconstruction of extensive proximal femoral bone loss is a major challenge during total hip arthroplasty (THA). Proximal femoral replacement (PFR), initially used for bone tumors, is an alternative to allograft-prosthetic composite reconstruction. However, PFRs present a high complication rate, particularly related to dislocation. Moreover, dual mobility cups (DMCs) are effective in preventing dislocation, and no study has yet assessed their association with PFRs. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the dislocation and complication rates in THA using PFRs with DMCs. Hypothesis: The use of a DMC decreases the dislocation rate associated with PFRs in nontumoral indications. Methods: From 2008 to 2017, 66 PFRs associated with a DMC (40 women, mean age = 71 years [26-94]) were included in our total joint registry and retrospectively reviewed. The main indications were complex periprosthetic and pertrochanteric fractures (26 THAs, 40%), aseptic loosening (22 THAs, 33%) and periprosthetic joint infections (18 THAs, 27%). A single design of PFR implant was used (Global Modular Replacement System (GMRS), Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, USA) with an uncemented stem in 54 THAs (82%). Results: Eighteen complications (27%) were reported at a mean follow-up of 4.6 years [2-10]: 5 dislocations (7.5%), 9 periprosthetic joint infections (13.6%), 2 aseptic loosening (3%) and 2 femur fractures (3%). Overall survivorship at 5 years was 72% (95% CI: 58-82). Survivorship free from dislocation was 94% (95% CI: 85-98) at 1 year. The mean Harris Hip Score was 70 +/- 16.4 [26-100] at latest follow-up. Conclusion: The use of DMCs limits the risk of PFR dislocation, in comparison to other series in the literature that used large femoral heads, without compromising implant survivorship. In addition, DMCs make it possible to overcome the potential risks of mechanical failure associated with constrained acetabular components..(c) 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
Quality of Life Following Proximal Femoral Replacement Using a Modular System in Revision THA [J].
Al-Taki, Muhyeddine M. ;
Masri, Bassam A. ;
Duncan, Clive P. ;
Garbuz, Donald S. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (02) :470-475
[2]
Clinical and dynamometric results of hip abductor system repair by trochanteric hydroxyapatite plate with modular implant after resection of proximal femoral tumors [J].
Crenn, Vincent ;
Briand, Sylvain ;
Rosset, Philippe ;
Mattei, Jean-Camille ;
Fouasson-Chailloux, Alban ;
Le Nail, Louis-Romee ;
Waast, Denis ;
Ropars, Mickael ;
Gouin, Francois .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2019, 105 (07) :1319-1325
[3]
Proximal femoral replacement in non-oncologic patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty [J].
De Martino, Ivan ;
D'Apolito, Rocco ;
Nocon, Allina A. ;
Sculco, Thomas P. ;
Sculco, Peter K. ;
Bostrom, Mathias P. .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 43 (10) :2227-2233
[4]
DEEP WOUND SEPSIS FOLLOWING TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY [J].
FITZGERALD, RH ;
NOLAN, DR ;
ILSTRUP, DM ;
VANSCOY, RE ;
WASHINGTON, JA ;
COVENTRY, MB .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1977, 59 (07) :847-855
[5]
The Modular Universal Tumour And Revision System (MUTARS®) in endoprosthetic revision surgery [J].
Gebert, Carsten ;
Wessling, Martin ;
Goetze, Christian ;
Gosheger, Georg ;
Hardes, Jendrik .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2010, 34 (08) :1261-1265
[6]
Five-year outcome of proximal femoral endoprosthetic arthroplasty for non-tumour indications [J].
Grammatopoulos, G. ;
Alvand, A. ;
Martin, H. ;
Whitwell, D. ;
Taylor, A. ;
Gibbons, C. L. M. H. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2016, 98B (11) :1463-1470
[8]
Otto Aufranc Award: Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA Reduced Dislocation, Rerevision, and Reoperation Compared With Large Femoral Heads [J].
Hartzler, Molly A. ;
Abdel, Matthew P. ;
Sculco, Peter K. ;
Taunton, Michael J. ;
Pagnano, Mark W. ;
Hanssen, Arlen D. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 476 (02) :293-301
[9]
The stability of the hip after the use of a proximal femoral endoprosthesis for oncological indications ANALYSIS OF VARIABLES RELATING TO THE PATIENT AND THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE [J].
Henderson, E. R. ;
Keeney, B. J. ;
Pala, E. ;
Funovics, P. T. ;
Eward, W. C. ;
Groundland, J. S. ;
Ehrlichman, L. K. ;
Puchner, S. S. E. ;
Brigman, B. E. ;
Ready, J. E. ;
Temple, H. T. ;
Ruggieri, P. ;
Windhager, R. ;
Letson, G. D. ;
Hornicek, F. J. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2017, 99B (04) :531-537
[10]
CLASSIFICATION OF TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES [J].
JENSEN, JS .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1980, 51 (05) :803-810