Social dominance theory: Its agenda and method

被引:339
作者
Sidanius, J
Pratto, F
van Laar, C
Levin, S
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Dept Psychol, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[3] Leiden Univ, Dept Psychol, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Dept Educ, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Claremont Mckenna Coll, Dept Psychol, Claremont, CA 91711 USA
关键词
social dominance theory; racism; system justification theory; social identity theory;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00401.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The theory has been misconstrued in four primary ways, which are often expressed as the claims of psychological reductionism, conceptual redundancy, biological reductionism, and hierarchy justification. This paper addresses these claims and suggests how social dominance theory builds on and moves beyond social identity theory and system justification theory.
引用
收藏
页码:845 / 880
页数:36
相关论文
共 153 条
[1]   COMMENTS ON THE MOTIVATIONAL STATUS OF SELF-ESTEEM IN SOCIAL IDENTITY AND INTERGROUP DISCRIMINATION [J].
ABRAMS, D ;
HOGG, MA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 18 (04) :317-334
[2]  
Adorno T. W., 1950, AUTHORITARIAN PERSON
[3]  
Allport G., 1954, The Nature of Prejudice
[4]   The other "authoritarian personality" [J].
Altemeyer, B .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 30, 1998, 30 :47-92
[5]  
Altemeyer B., 1988, Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism
[6]  
[Anonymous], SOCIAL IDENTITY CONT
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1993, SOCIAL STRATIFICATIO
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1996, ANN M INT SOC POL PS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2003, REFLECTIONS REVOLUTI
[10]  
[Anonymous], AFRICAN AM PSYCHOL T