Lone female headship and welfare policy in Canada

被引:7
作者
Dooley, MD [1 ]
Gascon, S
Lefebvre, P
Merrigan, P
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[2] Univ Quebec, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.2307/146394
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The principal qualifying condition for welfare in Canada, unlike the United States, is financial need-there are no demographic criteria. We use a time-series of annual, national cross-sections for the period 1981 through 1993 to estimate a model of lone-female headship. Our findings do not support the hypothesis that welfare benefit levels for one-parent and two-parent families are important determinants of the likelihood that a Canadian woman is a lone mother. In all models with provincial fixed effects, the coefficients for welfare benefits are small, statistically insignificant, and often of the unexpected sign. We do find that the probability that a woman is a lone mother is generally associated in the expected fashion with her earnings capacity and the earnings capacity of her potential male partner and with her age and schooling.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 602
页数:16
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   WELFARE AND THE FAMILY - THE CANADIAN EXPERIENCE [J].
ALLEN, DW .
JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 1993, 11 (01) :S201-S233
[2]  
Becker G., 1991, TREATISE FAMILY
[3]  
Blank RM., 1993, SMALL DIFFERENCES MA, P191
[4]  
CAIN G, 1993, MARITAL BREAKUPS SEA
[5]  
Card D., 1993, SMALL DIFFERENCES MA, P149
[6]   The evolution of welfare participation among Canadian lone mothers, 1973-1991 [J].
Dooley, MD .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 1999, 32 (03) :589-612
[7]   A REASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECT OF INCOME-MAINTENANCE ON MARITAL DISSOLUTION IN THE SEATTLE-DENVER EXPERIMENT [J].
HANNAN, MT ;
TUMA, NB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1990, 95 (05) :1270-1298
[8]  
HECKMAN JJ, 1987, NEW PALGRAVE DICT EC
[9]  
Hoyne HW, 1997, J PUBLIC ECON, V65, P89
[10]   INCOME, WORK AND MARITAL DISSOLUTION - CANADIAN EXPERIMENTAL-EVIDENCE [J].
HUM, DPJ ;
CHOUDHRY, S .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE FAMILY STUDIES, 1992, 23 (02) :249-265