Unequal evolutionary conservation of human protein interactions in interologous networks.

被引:230
作者
Brown, Kevin V.
Jurisica, Igor
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Ontario Canc Inst, Div Signaling Biol, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Comp Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1186/gb-2007-8-5-r95
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background : Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks have been transferred between organisms using interologs, allowing model organisms to supplement the interactomes of higher eukaryotes. However, the conservation of various network components has not been fully explored. Unequal conservation of certain network components may limit the ability to fully expand the target interactomes using interologs. Results : In this study, we transfer high quality human interactions to lower eukaryotes, and examine the evolutionary conservation of individual network components. When human proteins are mapped to yeast, we find a strong positive correlation (r = 0.50, P = 3.9 x 10(-4)) between evolutionary conservation and the number of interacting proteins, which is also found when mapped to other model organisms. Examining overlapping PPI networks, Gene Ontology (GO) terms, and gene expression data, we are able to demonstrate that protein complexes are conserved preferentially, compared to transient interactions in the network. Despite the preferential conservation of complexes, and the fact that the human interactome comprises an abundance of transient interactions, we demonstrate how transferring human PPIs to yeast augments this well-studied protein interaction network, using the coatomer complex and replisome as examples. Conclusions : Human proteins, like yeast proteins, show a correlation between the number of interacting partners and evolutionary conservation. The preferential conservation of proteins with higher degree leads to enrichment in protein complexes when interactions are transferred between organisms using interologs.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] BIND - a data specification for storing and describing biomolecular interactions, molecular complexes and pathways
    Bader, GD
    Hogue, CWV
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2000, 16 (05) : 465 - 477
  • [2] Analyzing yeast protein-protein interaction data obtained from different sources
    Bader, GD
    Hogue, CWV
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2002, 20 (10) : 991 - 997
  • [3] Stratus not altocumulus: A new view of the yeast protein interaction network
    Batada, Nizar N.
    Reguly, Teresa
    Breitkreutz, Ashton
    Boucher, Lorrie
    Breitkreutz, Bobby-Joe
    Hurst, Laurence D.
    Tyers, Mike
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2006, 4 (10) : 1720 - 1731
  • [4] Online predicted human interaction database
    Brown, KR
    Jurisica, I
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 21 (09) : 2076 - 2082
  • [5] COLLINS S, 2007, MOL CELL PROTEOMICS
  • [6] Bridging structural biology and genomics: assessing protein interaction data with known complexes
    Edwards, AM
    Kus, B
    Jansen, R
    Greenbaum, D
    Greenblatt, J
    Gerstein, M
    [J]. TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2002, 18 (10) : 529 - 536
  • [7] Modularity and evolutionary constraint on proteins
    Fraser H.B.
    [J]. Nature Genetics, 2005, 37 (4) : 351 - 352
  • [8] Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network
    Fraser, HB
    Hirsh, AE
    Steinmetz, LM
    Scharfe, C
    Feldman, MW
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2002, 296 (5568) : 750 - 752
  • [9] A simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions
    Fraser, HB
    Wall, DP
    Hirsh, AE
    [J]. BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2003, 3 (1)
  • [10] Analysis of the human protein interactome and comparison with yeast, worm and fly interaction datasets
    Gandhi, TKB
    Zhong, J
    Mathivanan, S
    Karthick, L
    Chandrika, KN
    Mohan, SS
    Sharma, S
    Pinkert, S
    Nagaraju, S
    Periaswamy, B
    Mishra, G
    Nandakumar, K
    Shen, BY
    Deshpande, N
    Nayak, R
    Sarker, M
    Boeke, JD
    Parmigiani, G
    Schultz, J
    Bader, JS
    Pandey, A
    [J]. NATURE GENETICS, 2006, 38 (03) : 285 - 293