Developing China's Ecological Redline Policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning

被引:395
作者
Bai, Yang [1 ]
Wong, Christina P. [2 ]
Jiang, Bo [3 ]
Hughes, Alice C. [1 ]
Wang, Min [4 ]
Wang, Qing [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Ctr Integrat Conservat, Xishuangbanna Trop Bot Garden, Menglun 666303, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Eco Environm Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[3] Changjiang Water Resources Protect Inst, Wuhan 430051, Hubei, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Acad Environm Sci, Inst Appl Ecol, Shanghai 200233, Peoples R China
来源
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 2018年 / 9卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
FRAMEWORK; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; TRADEOFFS; DECISIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-018-05306-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Ecosystems services (ES) assessment is a significant scientific topic recognized for its potential to address sustainability issues. However, there is an absence of science-policy frameworks in land use planning that lead to the ES science being used in policy. China's Ecological Redline Policy (ERP) is one of the first national policies utilizing multiple ES, but there is no standardized approach for working across the science-policy interface. We propose a transdisciplinary framework to determine ecological redline areas (ERAs) in Shanghai using: ES, biodiversity and ecologically fragile hotspots, landscape structure, and stakeholder opinions. We determine the five criteria to identify ERAs for Shanghai using multi-temporal, high resolution images (0.5 m) and biophysical models. We examine ERP effectiveness by comparing land use scenarios for 2040. Compared to alternative land uses, ES increase significantly under the ERP. The inclusion of ES in spatial planning led stake-holders to increase terrestrial habitat protection by 174% in Shanghai. Our analysis suggests that strategic planning for ES could reduce tradeoffs between environmental quality and development.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Response to Turnhout et al.'s Rethinking Biodiversity: From Goods and Services to "Living With" [J].
Abson, David J. ;
Hanspach, Jan .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2014, 7 (03) :334-335
[2]  
Albert C, 2014, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V29, P1301, DOI [10.1007/s10980-014-0085-0, 10.1007/s10980-014-9990-5]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, OUTL SHANGH MAT PLAN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Green is Gold: The Strategy and Actions of China's Ecological Civilization. UN Environment Programme
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, INTERGOVERNMENTAL PA, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.PHRS.2011.03.002
[7]   Embedding ecosystem services in coastal planning leads to better outcomes for people and nature [J].
Arkema, Katie K. ;
Verutes, Gregory M. ;
Wood, Spencer A. ;
Clarke-Samuels, Chantalle ;
Rosado, Samir ;
Canto, Maritza ;
Rosenthal, Amy ;
Ruckelshaus, Mary ;
Guannel, Gregory ;
Toft, Jodie ;
Faries, Joe ;
Silver, Jessica M. ;
Griffin, Robert ;
Guerry, Anne D. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (24) :7390-7395
[8]   New ecological redline policy (ERP) to secure ecosystem services in China [J].
Bai, Yang ;
Jiang, Bo ;
Wang, Min ;
Li, Hui ;
Alatalo, Juha M. ;
Huang, Shenfa .
LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 55 :348-351
[9]   Bringing Ecosystem Services into Economic Decision-Making: Land Use in the United Kingdom [J].
Bateman, Ian J. ;
Harwood, Amii R. ;
Mace, Georgina M. ;
Watson, Robert T. ;
Abson, David J. ;
Andrews, Barnaby ;
Binner, Amy ;
Crowe, Andrew ;
Day, Brett H. ;
Dugdale, Steve ;
Fezzi, Carlo ;
Foden, Jo ;
Hadley, David ;
Haines-Young, Roy ;
Hulme, Mark ;
Kontoleon, Andreas ;
Lovett, Andrew A. ;
Munday, Paul ;
Pascual, Unai ;
Paterson, James ;
Perino, Grischa ;
Sen, Antara ;
Siriwardena, Gavin ;
van Soest, Daan ;
Termansen, Mette .
SCIENCE, 2013, 341 (6141) :45-50
[10]   A research agenda for ecosystem services in American environmental and land use planning [J].
BenDor, Todd K. ;
Spurlock, Danielle ;
Woodruff, Sierra C. ;
Olander, Lydia .
CITIES, 2017, 60 :260-271