Comparison of trough effect of telmisartan vs perindopril using self blood pressure measurement:: EVERESTE study

被引:25
作者
Ragot, S
Ezzaher, A
Meunier, A
Poterre, M
Bourkaib, R
Herpin, D
机构
[1] Fac Med & Pharm, F-86005 Poitiers, France
[2] CHU La Miletrie, Poitiers, France
[3] Lab GlaxoSmithKline, Marly Le Roi, France
关键词
self-blood pressure measurement; telmisartan; perindopril; trough effect;
D O I
10.1038/sj.jhh.1001494
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
This multicentre study was aimed at comparing the trough effect of telmisartan and perindopril on diastolic blood pressure (DBP), using self blood pressure measurement (SBPM). A second objective was to compare the data obtained from SBPM with those provided by automatic office BP measurement. A total of 441 mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients were randomised to receive either telmisartan 40mg or perindopril 4mg for a period of 12 weeks. Patients whose clinic DBP remained higher than or equal to 90 mmHg at the end of the 6th week (W6) were given a double-dose regimen. Office BP and SBPM were performed at baseline (WO), at W6 and at week 12 (W12), both with the same automatic device. A greater diminution of trough DBP was obtained with telmisartan (-6.6 +/- 6.7 mmHg) than with perindopril (-5.1 +/- 7.0 mmHg; P=0.018). Regarding clinic BP, the same results were observed. Doubling dose was significantly less frequent with telmisartan (41%; n=85) than with perindopril (55%; n=115, P=0.005). Mean values of SBPM were lower than office BP values, with a difference of a greater importance at WO than at W12: 6.6 vs 4.7 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (P<0.005) and 3.2 vs 1.4 mmHg for DBP (P<0.0001). At W12, isolated office hypertension was found in 9% of the patients (n=37), while there were 14% of the patients (n=55) with isolated home hypertension. In conclusion, the trough effect on DBP was statistically higher with telmisartan than with perindopril. SBPM values were lower than office BP values, with greater differences before than after treatment. About a quarter of the patients were found to be controlled with a method but not with the other one.
引用
收藏
页码:865 / 873
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
ABE H, 1992, HIGH BLOOD PRESS, V1, P279
[2]   Guidelines for the use of self-blood pressure monitoring: a summary report of the first international consensus conference [J].
Asmar, R ;
Zanchetti, A .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2000, 18 (05) :493-508
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   Is "isolated home" hypertension as opposed to "isolated office" hypertension a sign of greater cardiovascular risk? [J].
Bobrie, G ;
Genès, N ;
Vaur, L ;
Clerson, P ;
Vaisse, B ;
Mallion, JM ;
Chatellier, G .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 161 (18) :2205-2211
[5]   Home blood pressure: Accuracy is independent of monitoring schedules [J].
Brook, RD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2000, 13 (06) :625-631
[6]   EFFECTS OF SELF-MONITORING BY PATIENTS ON CONTROL OF HYPERTENSION [J].
CARNAHAN, JE ;
NUGENT, CA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1975, 269 (01) :69-73
[7]   Optimisation of antihypertensive treatment by crossover rotation of four major classes [J].
Dickerson, JEC ;
Hingorani, AD ;
Ashby, MJ ;
Palmer, CR ;
Brown, MJ .
LANCET, 1999, 353 (9169) :2008-2013
[8]  
EDMONDS D, 1985, J HYPERTENS, V3, P31
[9]   Usefulness of home blood pressure measurements in assessing the effect of treatment in a single-blind placebo-controlled open trial [J].
Imai, Y ;
Ohkubo, T ;
Hozawa, A ;
Tsuji, I ;
Matsubara, M ;
Araki, T ;
Chonan, K ;
Kikuya, M ;
Satoh, H ;
Hisamichi, S ;
Nagai, K .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2001, 19 (02) :179-185
[10]  
JAMES JD, 1998, HYPERTENSION, V11, P545