What does 25 years of experience tell us about the state of performance measurement in public policy and management?

被引:4
作者
Johnsen, Å [1 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Univ Coll, Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Performance measurement in public management is a contested issue. Performance indicators (PIs) have diverse functions for different stakeholders over the life-cycle of a public policy, and the search for better PIs is an ongoing effort. However, instead of seeing the running down, proliferation and strategic use of performance information as dysfunctional, these effects are probably the unavoidable outcomes of functional and effective performance measurement systems in open societies and competitive democracies. PIs may effectively create 'creative destruction' of the present political or managerial status quo. Thus, PIs in political competition may be as important as prices in market competition.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 17
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Performance monitoring in the Australian public service: A government-wide analysis [J].
Alford, J ;
Baird, J .
PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 1997, 17 (02) :49-58
[2]  
Anthony Downs., 1957, An economic theory of democracy
[3]  
Ball R, 1996, LOCAL GOV STUD, V22, P40
[4]   Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures [J].
Behn, RD .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2003, 63 (05) :586-606
[5]   THE BIG QUESTIONS OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT [J].
BEHN, RD .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1995, 55 (04) :313-324
[6]  
Boyne G, 1997, LOCAL GOV STUD, V23, P17
[7]  
Breton A., 1996, Competitive Governments: an Economic Theory of Politics and Public Finance
[8]  
Brignall S., 2000, Management Accounting Research, V11, P281, DOI [10.1006/mare.2000.0136, DOI 10.1006/MARE.2000.0136]
[9]  
Carter N., 1992, ORG MEASURE SUCCESS
[10]  
Drucker Peter., 1954, PRINCIPLES MANAGEMEN