Effects of birth spacing on maternal health:: a systematic review

被引:303
作者
Conde-Agudelo, Agustin [1 ]
Rosas-Bermudez, Anyeli
Kafury-Goeta, Ana C.
机构
[1] Fdn Santa Fe Bogota, Ctr Estudios & Invest Salud, Bogota, Colombia
[2] Fdn Santa Fe Bogota, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bogota, Colombia
[3] Univ Autonoma Occidente, Dept Biostat, Cali, Colombia
[4] Clin MaternoInfantil Los Farallones, Cali, Colombia
关键词
birth spacing; interpregnancy interval; maternal morbidity; maternal mortality; preeclampsia;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.055
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The objective of the study was to explore the association between birth spacing and risk of adverse maternal outcomes. The study was a systematic review of observational studies that examined the relationship between interpregnancy or birth intervals and adverse maternal outcomes. Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, long interpregnancy intervals, possibly longer than 5 years, are independently associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia. There is emerging evidence that women with long interpregnancy intervals are at increased risk for labor dystocia and that short intervals are associated with increased risks of uterine rupture in women attempting a vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery and uteroplacental bleeding disorders ( placental abruption and placenta previa). Less clear is the association between short intervals and other adverse outcomes such as maternal death and anemia. Long interpregnancy intervals are independently associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia. Both short and long interpregnancy intervals seem to be related to other adverse maternal outcomes, but more research is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 308
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
ANANDALAKSHMY PN, 1993, J FAM WELFARE, V39, P1
[2]   Higher risk of pre-eclampsia after change of partner. An effect of longer interpregnancy intervals? [J].
Basso, O ;
Christensen, K ;
Olsen, J .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 12 (06) :624-629
[3]   Interdelivery interval and uterine rupture [J].
Bujold, E ;
Mehta, SH ;
Bujold, C ;
Gauthier, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (05) :1199-1202
[4]   Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval:: cross sectional study [J].
Conde-Agudelo, A ;
Belizán, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7271) :1255-1259
[5]  
Dairo M D, 2004, Afr J Med Med Sci, V33, P213
[6]  
DAVANZO J, 2005, WHO TECHNICAL CONSUL
[7]   Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of incision healing after cesarean sections [J].
Dicle, O ;
Kucukler, C ;
Pirnar, T ;
Erata, Y ;
Posaci, C .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (01) :31-34
[8]   The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions [J].
Downs, SH ;
Black, N .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1998, 52 (06) :377-384
[9]  
ERICKSON JD, 1979, LANCET, V1, P52
[10]   Association of interpregnancy interval with uterine scar failure in labor: A case-control study [J].
Esposito, MA ;
Menihan, CA ;
Malee, MP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (05) :1180-1183