Warfarin dose reduction vs watchful waiting for mild elevations in the international normalized ratio

被引:30
作者
Banet, GA [1 ]
Waterman, AD [1 ]
Milligan, PE [1 ]
Gatchel, SK [1 ]
Gage, BF [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Gen Med Sci, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
anticoagulants; adverse effects; outpatient management; warfarin; administration and dosage;
D O I
10.1378/chest.123.2.499
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Whether clinicians should decrease the warfarin dose in response to a mild, asymptomatic elevation in the international normalized ratio (INR) is unknown. Objectives: The study objectives were as follows: (1) to evaluate the safety of an anticoagulation service (ACS) policy advocating that the warfarin dose not be changed for isolated, asymptomatic INRs of less than or equal to 3.4; (2) to compare the dosing strategies of an ACS and primary care providers (PCPs); and (3) to quantify the relationship between reduction of the warfarin dose and the subsequent fall in the INR. Design and setting: Randomized controlled study of health maintenance organization outpatients who were receiving warfarin. Patients: We identified 231 patients with a target INR of 2.5 and an isolated, asymptomatic INR between 3.2 and 3.4. Our ACS monitored 103 of the patients; PCPs monitored the remaining 128 patients. Measurements: From all 231 patients, we obtained INRs and warfarin dosing history. From the 103 ACS enrollees, we also recorded adverse events. Results: One ACS patient had epistaxis in the 30 days after the elevated INR. Twenty-three percent of ACS enrollees and 47% of PCP patients reduced their warfarin dose (p < 0.001). The median follow-up INRs were similar in both cohorts: 2.7 in the ACS enrollees and 2.6 in the PCP patients. However, in a subgroup analysis of 190 patients who presented with an INR of 3.2 or 3.3, ACS enrollees were more likely to have a follow-up INR in the range of 2 to 3 (p = 0.03). The median follow-up INR was 2.7 in 148 patients who maintained their warfarin dose, 2.5 in 77 patients who decreased their dose by 1 to 20%, and 1.7 in 6 patients who decreased their dose by 21 to 43% (p < 0.001). Conclusions: These findings support maintaining the same warfarin dose in asymptomatic patients with an INR of :5 3.3, and reducing the dose for patients who have a greater INR or an increased risk of hemorrhage. Warfarin dose reductions > 20% should be avoided for mildly elevated INRs.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 503
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Managing oral anticoagulant therapy
    Ansell, J
    Hirsh, J
    Dalen, J
    Bussey, H
    Anderson, D
    Poller, L
    Jacobson, A
    Deykin, D
    Matchar, D
    [J]. CHEST, 2001, 119 (01) : 22S - 38S
  • [2] FACTORS AFFECTING THE PRECISION OF WARFARIN TREATMENT
    BRITT, RP
    JAMES, AH
    RASKINO, CL
    THOMPSON, SG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1992, 45 (11) : 1003 - 1006
  • [3] Comparison of an anticoagulation clinic with usual medical care -: Anticoagulation control, patient outcomes, and health care costs
    Chiquette, E
    Amato, MG
    Bussey, HI
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (15) : 1641 - 1647
  • [4] CORTELAZZO S, 1993, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V69, P316
  • [5] A graphic nomogram for warfarin dosage adjustment
    Dalere, GM
    Coleman, RW
    Lum, BL
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1999, 19 (04): : 461 - 467
  • [6] The risk for and severity of bleeding complications in elderly patients treated with warfarin
    Fihn, SD
    Callahan, CM
    Martin, DC
    McDonell, MB
    Henikoff, JG
    White, RH
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 124 (11) : 970 - +
  • [7] Franke CL, 1997, ANN NEUROL, V42, P857
  • [8] Management and dosing of warfarin therapy
    Gage, BF
    Fihn, SD
    White, RH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 109 (06) : 481 - 488
  • [9] Horton JD, 1999, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V59, P635
  • [10] RISK-FACTORS FAR INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE IN OUTPATIENTS TAKING WARFARIN
    HYLEK, EM
    SINGER, DE
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 120 (11) : 897 - 902