Multipolar consensus for phylogenetic trees

被引:11
作者
Bonnard, Cecile [1 ]
Berry, Vincent [1 ]
Lartillot, Nicolas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier 2, CNRS, UMR 5506, Lab Informat Robot & Microelect, F-34392 Montpellier 5, France
关键词
D O I
10.1080/10635150600969880
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Collections of phylogenetic trees are usually summarized using consensus methods. These methods build a single tree, supposed to be representative of the collection. However, in the case of heterogeneous collections of trees, the resulting consensus may be poorly resolved ( strict consensus, majority-rule consensus,...), or may perform arbitrary choices among mutually incompatible clades, or splits ( greedy consensus). Here, we propose an alternative method, which we call the multipolar consensus ( MPC). Its aim is to display all the splits having a support above a predefined threshold, in a minimum number of consensus trees, or poles. We show that the problem is equivalent to a graph-coloring problem, and propose an implementation of the method. Finally, we apply the MPC to real data sets. Our results indicate that, typically, all the splits down to a weight of 10% can be displayed in no more than 4 trees. In addition, in some cases, biologically relevant secondary signals, which would not have been present in any of the classical consensus trees, are indeed captured by our method, indicating that the MPC provides a convenient exploratory method for phylogenetic analysis. The method was implemented in a package freely available at http://www.lirmm.fr/similar to cbonnard/MPC.html.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 843
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   COMBINABLE COMPONENT CONSENSUS [J].
BREMER, K .
CLADISTICS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE WILLI HENNIG SOCIETY, 1990, 6 (04) :369-372
[2]   An empirical assessment of long-branch attraction artefacts in deep eukaryotic phylogenomics [J].
Brinkmann, H ;
Van der Giezen, M ;
Zhou, Y ;
De Raucourt, GP ;
Philippe, H .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2005, 54 (05) :743-757
[3]  
Bryant D., 2003, BioConsensus, P163
[4]  
Bryant David, 1997, PhD thesis
[5]   1977 RIETZ LECTURE - BOOTSTRAP METHODS - ANOTHER LOOK AT THE JACKKNIFE [J].
EFRON, B .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1979, 7 (01) :1-26
[6]   Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics [J].
Erixon, P ;
Svennblad, B ;
Britton, T ;
Oxelman, B .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2003, 52 (05) :665-673
[7]  
FELSENSTEIN J, 1985, EVOLUTION, V39, P783, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x
[8]  
Felsenstein J., 1993, PHYLIP
[9]  
Felsenstein Joseph, 2004, Inferring_phylogenies, V2
[10]   SUCCESS OF MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD PHYLOGENY INFERENCE IN THE 4-TAXON CASE [J].
GAUT, BS ;
LEWIS, PO .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 1995, 12 (01) :152-162