The influence of language on theory of mind: a training study

被引:281
作者
Hale, CM
Tager-Flusberg, H
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anat & Neurobiol, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Childrens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-7687.00289
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
This study investigated the role of language in the development of theory of mind. It was hypothesized that the acquisition of the syntactic and semantic properties of sentential complements would facilitate the development of a representational theory of mind. Sixty preschoolers who failed false belief and sentential complement pretests were randomly assigned to training on false belief, sentential complements or relative clauses (as a control group). All the children were post-tested on a set of different theory of mind tasks, sentential complements and relative clauses. The main findings were that the group trained on sentential complements not only acquired the linguistic knowledge fostered by the training, but also significantly increased their scores on a range of theory of mind tasks. In contrast, false belief training only led to improved theory of mind scores but had no influence on language. The control group, trained on relative clauses, showed no improvement on theory of mind post-tests. These findings are taken as evidence that the acquisition of sentential complements contributes to the development of theory of mind in preschoolers.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 359
页数:14
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], THEORIES THEORIES MI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470147658
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, CHILDRENS REASONING
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, CHILD STUDY J
[5]   THEORY OF MIND DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL UNDERSTANDING [J].
ASTINGTON, JW ;
JENKINS, JM .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 1995, 9 (2-3) :151-165
[6]   A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development [J].
Astington, JW ;
Jenkins, JM .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 35 (05) :1311-1320
[7]   THEORETICAL EXPLANATIONS OF CHILDRENS UNDERSTANDING OF THE MIND [J].
ASTINGTON, JW ;
GOPNIK, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 9 :7-31
[8]   Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind [J].
Bloom, P ;
German, TP .
COGNITION, 2000, 77 (01) :B25-B31
[9]  
Bretherton I., 1981, Infant Social Cognition, V333, P73
[10]  
Carey S., 1985, CONCEPTUAL CHANGE CH