EMA-Real-Time PCR as a Reliable Method for Detection of Viable Salmonella in Chicken and Eggs

被引:62
作者
Wang, Luxin [1 ]
Mustapha, Azlin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Div Food Syst & Bioengn, Food Sci Program, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
chicken; detection; eggs; real-time PCR; viable Salmonella; ETHIDIUM MONOAZIDE; DEAD CELLS; ENTERICA; QUANTIFICATION; ENTERITIDIS; HATCHERIES; BACTERIA;
D O I
10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01525.x
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Culture-based Salmonella detection takes at least 4 d to complete. The use of TaqMan (R) probes allows the real-time PCR technique to be a rapid and sensitive way to detect foodborne pathogens. However, unlike RNA-based PCR, DNA-based PCR techniques cannot differentiate between DNA from live and dead cells. Ethidium bromide monoazide (EMA) is a dye that can bind to DNA of dead cells and prevent its amplification by PCR. An EMA staining step prior to PCR allows for the effective inhibition of false positive results from DNA contamination by dead cells. The aim of this study was to design an accurate detection method that can detect only viable Salmonella cells from poultry products. The sensitivity of EMA staining coupled with real-time PCR was compared to that of an RNA-based reverse transcription (RT)-real-time PCR. To prevent false negative results, an internal amplification control was added to the same reaction mixture as the target Salmonella sequences. With an optimized EMA staining step, the detection range of a subsequent real-time PCR was determined to be 10(3) to 10(9) CFU/mL for pure cultures and 10(5) to 10(9) CFU/mL for food samples, which was a wider detection range than for RT-real-time PCR. After a 12-h enrichment step, EMA staining combined with real-time PCR could detect as low as 10 CFU/mL Salmonella from chicken rinses and egg broth. The use of EMA with a DNA-based real-time PCR can successfully prevent false positive results and represents a simple, yet accurate detection tool for enhancing the safety of food.
引用
收藏
页码:M134 / M139
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   SALMONELLA IDENTIFICATION BY THE POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION [J].
AABO, S ;
RASMUSSEN, OF ;
ROSSEN, L ;
SORENSEN, PD ;
OLSEN, JE .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PROBES, 1993, 7 (03) :171-178
[2]  
ANDREWS WH, 1995, FDAS BACTERIOLOGICAL
[3]  
Olsen S J, 2000, MMWR CDC Surveill Summ, V49, P1
[4]   Detection of Salmonella from chicken rinses and chicken hot dogs with the automated BAX PCR system [J].
Bailey, JS ;
Cosby, DE .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2003, 66 (11) :2138-2140
[5]   Evaluation of salmonella serotype distributions from commercial broiler hatcheries and grower houses [J].
Byrd, JA ;
DeLoach, JR ;
Corrier, DE ;
Nisbet, DJ ;
Stanker, LH .
AVIAN DISEASES, 1999, 43 (01) :39-47
[6]   EVALUATION OF PERSISTENCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF SALMONELLA SEROTYPE ISOLATION FROM POULTRY FARMS USING DRAG SWAB SAMPLING [J].
CALDWELL, DJ ;
HARGIS, BM ;
CORRIER, DE ;
VIDAL, L ;
DELOACH, JR .
AVIAN DISEASES, 1995, 39 (03) :617-621
[7]  
*CDC, 2006, SUMM STAT FOODB OUTB
[8]  
CDC, 2006, SALM SURV ANN SUMM 2
[9]   Viability of the Nonculturable Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139 [J].
Chaiyanan, S ;
Chaiyanan, S ;
Huq, A ;
Maugel, T ;
Colwell, RR .
SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 24 (03) :331-341
[10]   Assessing the prevalence of Salmonella enterica in poultry hatcheries by using hatched eggshell membranes [J].
Chao, M.-R. ;
Hsien, C.-H. ;
Yeh, C.-M. ;
Chou, S.-J. ;
Chu, C. ;
Su, Y.-C. ;
Yu, C.-Y. .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2007, 86 (08) :1651-1655