A general model for the analysis of mark-resight, mark-recapture, and band-recovery data under tag loss

被引:57
作者
Conn, PB
Kendall, WL
Samuel, MD
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Stat, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Res Ctr, Laurel, MD 20708 USA
[3] USGS, Natl Wildlife Res Ctr, Madison, WI 53711 USA
关键词
band recovery; barker model; collar retention; mark-recapture; mark-resight; survival; tag loss;
D O I
10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00245.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Estimates of waterfowl demographic parameters often come from resighting studies where birds fit with individually identifiable neck collars are resighted at a distance. Concerns have been raised about the effects of collar loss on parameter estimates, and the reliability of extrapolating from collared individuals to the population. Models previously proposed to account for collar loss do not allow survival or harvest parameters to depend on neck collar presence or absence. Also, few models have incorporated recent advances in mark-recapture theory that allow for multiple states or auxiliary encounters such as band recoveries. We propose a multistate model for tag loss in which the presence or absence of a collar is considered as a state variable. In this framework, demographic parameters are corrected for tag loss and questions related to collar effects on survival and recovery rates can be addressed. Encounters of individuals between closed sampling periods also can be incorporated in the analysis. We discuss data requirements for answering questions related to tag loss and sampling designs that lend themselves to this purpose. We illustrate the application of our model using a study of lesser snow geese (Chen caerulescens caerulescens).
引用
收藏
页码:900 / 909
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Effects of neckbands on survival and fidelity of white-fronted and Canada geese captured as non-breeding adults [J].
Alisauskas, RT ;
Lindberg, MS .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2002, 29 (1-4) :521-537
[2]  
ARNASON A N, 1973, Researches on Population Ecology (Tokyo), V15, P1
[3]  
ARNASON A N, 1972, Researches on Population Ecology (Tokyo), V13, P97
[4]   BIAS AND LOSS OF PRECISION DUE TO TAG LOSS IN JOLLY-SEBER ESTIMATES FOR MARK-RECAPTURE EXPERIMENTS [J].
ARNASON, AN ;
MILLS, KH .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 1981, 38 (09) :1077-1095
[5]  
Barker R. J., 2001, WILDLIFE LAND PEOPLE, P361
[6]   Efficiency gain from auxiliary data requiring additional nuisance parameters [J].
Barker, RJ ;
Kavalieris, L .
BIOMETRICS, 2001, 57 (02) :563-566
[7]   Joint modeling of live-recapture, tag-resight, and tag-recovery data [J].
Barker, RJ .
BIOMETRICS, 1997, 53 (02) :666-677
[8]  
BARKER RJ, 2004, IN PRESS STAT SINICA
[9]  
Bell M.C., 1993, P141
[10]  
Burnham K. P., 1998, MODEL SELECTION INFE