Nutritional support in patients with oesophageal cancer

被引:48
作者
Bozzetti, Federico [1 ]
机构
[1] Residenza Le Querce Milano Due, I-20090 Segrate, Italy
关键词
Nutritional support in cancer of the oesophagus; Oral nutritional supplements in cancer of the oesophagus; Enteral nutrition in cancer of the oesophagus; Parenteral nutrition in cancer of the oesophagus; Tube feeding in cancer of the oesophagus; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY; PARENTERAL-NUTRITION; ENTERAL NUTRITION; NECK-CANCER; GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER; BODY-MASS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; ENERGY-EXPENDITURE; ADVANCED HEAD;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-009-0664-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Obesity and overweight are risk factors for developing an oesophageal cancer, especially the adenocarcinoma in the distal oesophagus or at the gastroesophageal junction, and many patients still are overweight at the clinical presentation even if they are losing weight. Main mechanisms involved in weight loss are a decreased nutrients' intake and an alteration in metabolism due to a cytokine-driven inflammatory status. Malnutrition is a risk factor for a poor compliance to chemotherapy and radiation therapy and finally for the oncologic outcome. There is scientific evidence that frequently both conditions exist but in the advanced stages of disease metabolic alterations play a major role and are responsible for the poor response to nutritional support. Methods The literature about the nutritional support in patients with cancer of the oesophagus has been reviewed with special emphasis on randomised clinical trials whenever available. In surgical patients, both overweight and weight loss increase the risk of postoperative complications. Results In non-dysphagic patients receiving a neo-adjuvant oncologic treatment, the simple use of oral nutritional supplements is little effective in ameliorating the nutritional status, in contrast, an intensive dietetic surveillance associated with oral supplements can lead to better nutritional status, improved quality of life and better compliance with therapy. In dysphagic patients, many comparative non-randomised clinical studies have shown clinical benefits from tube feeding on the nutritional status and compliance with therapy. There is no apparent difference on the metabolic efficacy of the enteral versus parenteral nutrition. Studies on peri-operative nutrition in oesophagectomy patients were often underpowered and, hence, inconclusive, but the large experience on the nutritional support in patients with gastrointestinal cancer undergoing major abdominal surgery has clearly shown the benefits of the enteral nutrition. Both the American and the European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition have recognised a grade A recommendation for the nutritional support of malnourished gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing major surgery. Conclusions In patients with oesophageal cancer on chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, enteral nutrition (oral supplements +/- intensive counselling or tube feeding) is nutritionally and clinically beneficial. In surgical patients, a broad experience in major abdominal surgery supports the peri-operative use of enteral nutrition and especially of immune-enteral nutrition.
引用
收藏
页码:S41 / S50
页数:10
相关论文
共 93 条
  • [1] Enteral immuno-enhanced diets with arginine are safe and beneficial for patients early after esophageal cancer surgery
    Aiko, Satoshi
    Yoshizumi, Yutaka
    Ishizuka, Takamitsu
    Horio, Takuya
    Sakano, Takashi
    Kumano, Isao
    Kanai, Norishige
    Maehara, Tadaaki
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2008, 21 (07) : 619 - 627
  • [2] STATISTICS NOTES - ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF ABSENCE
    ALTMAN, DG
    BLAND, JM
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7003) : 485 - 485
  • [3] [Anonymous], AM SURG
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, NUTR DIET S1, V65, pS1
  • [5] THE EFFECT OF ORAL NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS ON HEAD AND NECK-CANCER
    ARNOLD, C
    RICHTER, MP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (06): : 1595 - 1599
  • [6] Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after oesophagogastric surgery: A prospective randomized comparison
    Baigrie, RJ
    Devitt, PG
    Watkin, DS
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 66 (10): : 668 - 670
  • [7] Outcomes after esophagectomy: A ten-year prospective cohort
    Bailey, SH
    Bull, DA
    Harpole, DH
    Rentz, JJ
    Neumayer, LA
    Pappas, TN
    Daley, J
    Henderson, WG
    Krasnicka, B
    Khuri, SF
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 75 (01) : 217 - 222
  • [8] Liver export protein synthetic rates are increased by oral meal feeding in weight-losing cancer patients
    Barber, MD
    Fearon, KCH
    McMillan, DC
    Slater, C
    Ross, JA
    Preston, T
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2000, 279 (03): : E707 - E714
  • [9] SURGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF MALNUTRITION AND IMMUNODEFICIENCY IN PATIENTS WITH CARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS
    BELGHITI, J
    LANGONNET, F
    BOURSTYN, E
    FEKETE, F
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1983, 70 (06) : 339 - 341
  • [10] Blee TH, 2002, AM SURGEON, V68, P163