An exhaustive analysis of heuristic methods for variable selection in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling

被引:97
作者
Cobos, Marlon E. [1 ,4 ]
Peterson, A. Townsend [1 ,4 ]
Osorio-Olvera, Luis [1 ,2 ]
Jimenez-Garcia, Daniel [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Biodivers Inst, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[2] Ctr Cambio Global & Sustentabilidad Sureste AC, 142 Centenario Inst Juarez, Villahermosa, Tabasco, Mexico
[3] Benemerita Univ Autonoma Puebla, Ctr Agroecol & Ambiente, Inst Ciencias, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico
[4] Univ Kansas, Biodivers Inst, 1345 Jayhawk Blvd, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
关键词
Jackknife; kuenm; Maxent; Variable contribution; Variable importance; Variance inflation factor; ENVIRONMENTAL DATA SETS; POTENTIAL DISTRIBUTION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SAMPLING BIAS; COMPLEXITY; IMPLEMENTATION; PREDICTORS; REGRESSION; SOFTWARE; RANGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoinf.2019.100983
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecological niche models and species distribution models are used in many fields of science. Despite their popularity, only recently have important aspects of the modeling process like model selection been developed. Choosing environmental variables with which to create these models is another critical part of the process, but methods currently in use are not consistent in their results and no comprehensive approach exists by which to perform this step. Here, we compared seven heuristic methods of variable selection against a novel approach that proposes to select best sets of variables by evaluating performance of models created with all combinations of variables and distinct parameter settings of the algorithm in concert. Our results were that-except for the jackknife method for one of the 12 species and fluctuation index for two of the 12 species-none of the heuristic methods for variable selection coincided with the exhaustive one. Performance decreased in models created using variables selected with heuristic methods and both underfitting and overfitting were detected when comparing their geographic projections with the ones of models created with variables selected with the exhaustive method. Using the exhaustive approach could be time consuming, so a two-step exercise may be necessary. However, using this method identifies adequate variable sets and parameter settings in concert that are associated with increased model performance.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Climate change influences on the potential geographic distribution of the disease vector tick Ixodes ricinus [J].
Alkishe, Abdelghafar A. ;
Peterson, A. Townsend ;
Samy, Abdallah M. .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (12)
[2]   Species-specific tuning increases robustness to sampling bias in models of species distributions: An implementation with Maxent [J].
Anderson, Robert P. ;
Gonzalez, Israel, Jr. .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2011, 222 (15) :2796-2811
[3]   Evaluating predictive models of species' distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models [J].
Anderson, RP ;
Lew, D ;
Peterson, AT .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2003, 162 (03) :211-232
[4]   Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling [J].
Araujo, Miguel B. ;
Guisan, Antoine .
JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2006, 33 (10) :1677-1688
[5]   Role of range and precision of the independent variable in regression of data [J].
Brauner, N ;
Shacham, M .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1998, 44 (03) :603-611
[6]   Comparing pseudo-absences generation techniques in Boosted Regression Trees models for conservation purposes: A case study on amphibians in a protected area [J].
Cerasoli, Francesco ;
Iannella, Mattia ;
D'Alessandro, Paola ;
Biondi, Maurizio .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (11)
[7]   kuenm: an R package for detailed development of ecological niche models using Maxent [J].
Cobos, Marlon E. ;
Peterson, A. Townsend ;
Barve, Narayani ;
Osorio-Olvera, Luis .
PEERJ, 2019, 7
[8]   SDMvspecies: a software for creating virtual species for species distribution modelling [J].
Duan, Ren-Yan ;
Kong, Xiao-Quan ;
Huang, Min-Yi ;
Wu, Gan-Lin ;
Wang, Zhi-Gao .
ECOGRAPHY, 2015, 38 (01) :108-110
[9]  
Dubois D. M., 1973, Rapport de sythese III
[10]   A working guide to boosted regression trees [J].
Elith, J. ;
Leathwick, J. R. ;
Hastie, T. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 77 (04) :802-813